build-your-own-x
chibicc
Our great sponsors
build-your-own-x | chibicc | |
---|---|---|
254 | 21 | |
256,741 | 8,504 | |
3.7% | - | |
6.7 | 0.0 | |
12 days ago | 6 months ago | |
C | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
build-your-own-x
-
How to Become a Software Engineer ?
View on GitHub
- Build Your Own X
-
10 GitHub repositories that every developer must follow
✅ codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x : https://github.com/codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x
- 18 Must-Bookmark GitHub Repositories Every Developer Should Know
-
Top 10 GitHub Repositories Every Developer Should Bookmark in 2024
8) Build Your Own X: Unleash your inner inventor and embark on a journey of self-creation with this collection of project ideas for building your own software, tools, and even operating systems. Fuel your entrepreneurial spirit and learn valuable engineering principles by bringing your innovative ideas to life. (https://github.com/codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x)
-
Crafting Interpreters
Also if we can someone merge this level of detail/guidance with the projects on https://codecrafters.io/, i would easily pay for something like that.
-
Resources I wish I knew when I started my career
Build your own X is another useful resource for a curious mind.
-
I want some fun things to code with python
This is what you're looking for: Build your own X!
- What now?
- GitHub - codecrafters-io/build-your-own-x: Master programming by recreating your favorite technologies from scratch.
chibicc
- Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
- Apple hiring compiler developers for improving Swift / C++ interoperability
-
GCC always assumes aligned pointer accesses
If a --k&r mode was to be reliable, wouldn't it need to get specified first? Otherwise people would start relying on some edge case.
If speed is not a requirement for the --k&r mode, you could just take the tis-interpreter and note that if it runs without UB, it is still much faster than an actual computer was when k&r were active.
Would it even be possible to specify a variant of C that contains no UB (e.g. would define exactly what happens on unaligned access), but can compile practical existing C89 programs? I wonder if it could be written such that it could actually specify the behaviour consistently across the language intersection supported by both of e.g. GCC 2.95 and Chibicc[0].
Or maybe there are so many bugs in GCC 2.95 that it would simply be infeasible? How much time would it take to specify?
[0]: https://github.com/rui314/chibicc
-
EU to vote regulation that has a considerable potential to hurt OSS
I was on the Eclipse Foundation call a few days ago regarding this topic and they said there was a well-established 3-part test for this in the EU courts. But I don't think I managed to take a screenshot, sorry.
Here is a snippet from the EU Blue Guide linked the from the Eclipse blog post:
"Commercial activity is understood as providing goods in a business related context. Non-profit organisations may be considered as carrying out commercial activities if they operate in such a context. This can only be appreciated on a case by case basis taking into account the regularity of the supplies, the characteristics of the product, the intentions of the supplier, etc. In principle, occasional supplies by charities or hobbyists should not be considered as taking place in a business related context."
I would consider GCC or React to fit this definition, while a hobby project like https://github.com/rui314/chibicc not to fit it.
-
Best practice to store context for a C compiler
chibicc
-
SectorC: A C Compiler in 512 bytes
chibicc: https://github.com/rui314/chibicc (A reasonably digestible C implementation)
- List of (open source) C compilers
- Chibicc – A Small C Compiler
-
Are Hoistings Possible for C++?
When you say a fork of LLVM, am I correct in assuming that you specifically mean a fork of Clang? I don't see how the compiler backend would affect support for language extensions, regardless of whether it's an exception to that such as Tcc, Cproc, the MIR C jitter, lacc, 8cc, 9cc, and chibicc. Most of those are not for production, excluding Cproc and Tcc (at least according to Suckless or Oasis).
What are some alternatives?
project-based-learning - Curated list of project-based tutorials
8cc - A Small C Compiler
languages - Powers multi-language support for CodeCrafters challenges
mold - Mold: A Modern Linker 🦠
Daily-Coding-DS-ALGO-Practice - A open source project🚀 for bringing all interview💥💥 and competative📘 programming💥💥 question under one repo📐📐
SmallerC - Simple C compiler
computer-science - :mortar_board: Path to a free self-taught education in Computer Science!
Co-dfns - High-performance, Reliable, and Parallel APL
every-programmer-should-know - A collection of (mostly) technical things every software developer should know about
quickjs - Public repository of the QuickJS Javascript Engine.
forward-proxy - Minimal HTTP(S) forward proxy using 150LOC and only standard libraries.
uemacs - Random version of microemacs with my private modificatons