build-push-action VS nocodb

Starting with version 4, docker/build-push-action builds images using the OCI format by default. OCI (Open Container Initiative) is the modern standard that is supported by AWS ECR. However, AWS Lambda does not support OCI image manifests. Lambda only accepts the older Docker v2 schema: application/vnd.docker.distribution.manifest.v2+json

docker/build-push-action

Does build-push-action solve this? I haven’t used their multi-arch configs but I was under the impression that it was pretty smooth.

https://github.com/docker/build-push-action

To publish images to Docker Hub, I use the docker/build-push-action@v6, where I specify:

Docker Build and Publish:

## Local Cache This method leverages local storage for caching Docker layers. The downside is that old cache entries aren’t deleted automatically, so the cache size might increase over time. A temporary fix involves moving and cleaning the cache after each build. ```yaml //".github/workflows/build.yml" name: Docker Build on: push: jobs: docker: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Set up Docker Buildx uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 // highlight-start - name: Cache Docker layers uses: actions/cache@v4 with: path: /tmp/.buildx-cache key: ${{ runner.os }}-buildx-${{ github.sha }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-buildx- // highlight-end - name: Login to Docker Hub uses: docker/login-action@v3 with: username: ${{ vars.DOCKERHUB_USERNAME }} password: ${{ secrets.DOCKERHUB_TOKEN }} // highlight-start - name: Build and push uses: docker/build-push-action@v6 with: push: true tags: user/app:latest cache-from: type=local,src=/tmp/.buildx-cache cache-to: type=local,dest=/tmp/.buildx-cache-new,mode=max // highlight-end - # Temp fix # https://github.com/docker/build-push-action/issues/252 # https://github.com/moby/buildkit/issues/1896 name: Move cache run: | rm -rf /tmp/.buildx-cache mv /tmp/.buildx-cache-new /tmp/.buildx-cache

Configuring the GitHub Actions Workflow We set up a GitHub Actions workflow to automate the integration and deployment process. The integration workflow is triggered on every pull request while the deployment workflow was triggered upon the completion of the build and push workflow for docker images gotten from the marketplace. It used the appleboy/ssh-action to execute the deployment script on the server.

We use the docker/build-push-action to build the application image. In addition to setting the correct tag, the image build step must also provide a label matching your service name. Because the image should be pushed to your container registry, we set push: true, and because we want ludicrous build speed we instruct the build step to utilize the GitHub Actions cache.

name: Lint and Dockerize the app on: push: branches: [master] pull_request: branches: [master] env: # Use docker.io for Docker Hub if empty REGISTRY: docker.io # github.repository as / IMAGE_NAME: ${{ github.repository }} jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: contents: read packages: write steps: - name: Checkout repository uses: actions/checkout@v2 - name: Set up Google Cloud uses: google-github-actions/[email protected] with: project_id: ${{ secrets.GCP_PROJECT_ID }} service_account_key: ${{ secrets.GCP_SA_KEY }} # Login against a Docker registry except on PR # https://github.com/docker/login-action - name: Log into registry ${{ env.REGISTRY }} # if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' uses: docker/login-action@v1 with: username: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }} password: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_PASSWORD }} # Extract metadata (tags, labels) for Docker # https://github.com/docker/metadata-action #- name: Extract Docker metadata # id: meta # uses: docker/metadata-action@98669ae865ea3cffbcbaa878cf57c20bbf1c6c38 # with: # images: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }} # Build and push Docker image with Buildx (don't push on PR) # https://github.com/docker/build-push-action - name: Build and push Docker image uses: docker/build-push-action@v2 with: context: ./ tags: ${{ secrets.DOCKER_USERNAME }}/magga:latest push: true file: ./Dockerfile - name: Image digest run: echo

NocoDB Support for Oracle Databases: Broadening compatibility for enterprise users (NocoDB GitHub).

GitHub: https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb

Hi,

https://mach3db.com is now a frontend to search Wikipedia and Stack Overflow article titles.

Right now I only have simple substring search to reduce load on my server.

The results are clickable links that point to lightweight versions of Wikipedia and Stack Overflow articles.

Please give it a try!

It works best in the Vivaldi browser: https://vivaldi.com/

Stack Overflow results can also be filtered by minimum number of comments.

Please email [email protected] if you are interested in our blazing fast PostgreSQL compatible hosted database solution.

We also offer NocoDB (https://nocodb.com/) and Grist (https://www.getgrist.com/) high speed hosted instances.

Thanks!

NocoDB, the open source Airtable alternative, has quietly removed audit logging capabilities from their open source version through a pull request deceptively titled "fix(nc-gui): audit log ui changes". This isn't a mere UI fix - it's a fundamental feature removal that pushes essential security functionality behind an enterprise paywall.

https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb/pull/9992

This raises serious questions about NocoDB's commitment to open source principles. For those affected, what alternative open source solutions have you found for audit logging in similar database tools?

It is possible to speed up the development and delivery process for many internal applications by using no-code or low code tools. These vary in offerings from open source to SaaS, including popular ones like AirTable, BudiBase, Retool, NocoDB and others. These can all greatly help speed up delivery times.

Notion, free for one-person team. Currently, probably the most popular application on the whole internet. You can do everything with it. Build a CRM, take notes, and store rows, as you can do with nocodb. Awesome Swiss-army knife, with a web app, and native clients (officially Mac and Windows). Unfortunately, in those days no offline mode, and privacy concerns, and everything was stored on Notion's side. Bessie last thing, why did I leave it?

NocoDB - Free & Open Source Airtable alternative - turns any SQL database into smart spreadsheet

NocoDB

GitHub https://github.com/nocodb/nocodb GitHub Star 43.7k The most recent update on GitHub One day ago Official website https://nocodb.com/ Documentation https://docs.nocodb.com/