rustic VS lsp-pyright

We will mainly look at 3 packages: s.el, f.el and dash.el. Two of these packages (first and last) are maintained by Magnar Sveen, who are also known for Emacs Rocks and What The .emacs.d (which are still great resources for learning and finding inspiration for your Emacs configuration!). We will also look at ht.el. These packages are used a lot in many of the Emacs packages you use in a day to day basis, like lsp-mode and rustic just to name a few. As most of these already have tons of examples in their READMEs, my main goal of this article is to inspire you to check them out. Hopefully you will know of one new package after reading this article :)

I was facing a problem because i wasnt able to run lsp server and i found this issue https://github.com/brotzeit/rustic/issues/217

In case somebody else is interested in adding missing crates automatically https://github.com/brotzeit/rustic/pull/429

;; https://github.com/brotzeit/rustic/issues/253 has been resolved this should

Emacs with rustic-mode

https://github.com/brotzeit/rustic uses it out of the box, overall it's a more complete extension than rust-mode.

ive had good results with pyright as well as pylsp.

I'm using Emacs 28.1 on macOS 11.6.6 (installed with brew) and want to setup a Python IDE with lsp-mode and lsp-pyright. My (not full) init.el looks like this (LSP and Python setups are at the bottom of the file):

autocompletion: lsp-mode + lsp-pyright

Microsoft's C#-based language server is no longer developed, as you say, but Pyright, which is the open-source part of Pylance, has an lsp-mode integration. It works better than the C#-based server did and IME works just as well as Pylance in VS Code.

There is pyright and its lsp-mode integration lsp-pyright. Pylance is "pyright + some closed source additions" AFAIK.