brolit-shell
slickstack
Our great sponsors
brolit-shell | slickstack | |
---|---|---|
2 | 4 | |
15 | 601 | |
- | 2.0% | |
9.2 | 9.9 | |
about 2 months ago | 6 days ago | |
Shell | Shell | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
brolit-shell
-
Multipurpose pure bash script that helps automatize common tasks for web developers
Link to the repo: /lemp-utils-scripts: LEMP Bash Utils for Ubuntu 18.04+ (github.com)
-
LEMP Utils for Ubuntu 18.04+
Here you pass all of the arguments as a single string ("$*"). You should pass them as an array ("$@"). Otherwise, it's impossible to tell how the arguments were actually separated on the command line.
slickstack
- SlickStack – Fast WordPress on Nginx
-
Using SlickStack to Install an Optimized WordPress Automatically on Ubuntu 20.04
I recently came across SlickStrack, which is a utility for setting up WordPress on Ubuntu LTS. It sets it up with Nginx and some other configs, by which it attempts to enforce some best practices with regards to speed and security.
-
PHP-FPM pools: ondemand vs. dynamic
I know this page is like 5 years old and I cannot comment anymore (closed):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14084265
......I never heard about that mod_PHP popularity was rising again compared with FPM pools. Is that totally fake news or that was true temporarily during 2017 only?
My understand that even cPanel hosting is still mostly using PHP-FPM with Apache and .htaccess (2021). Is there any case that using mod_PHP or disabling .htaccess can be faster than PHP-FPM or that is totally wrong.
For Nginx I know FPM is really the only option. And lots of arguments about ondemand, I see a lot of tutorials saying dynamic is better, but on this config file (PHP 7.4) and it says
https://github.com/littlebizzy/slickstack/blob/master/modules/php-fpm/7.4/www-conf.txt
"ondemand is best for the majority of VPS servers (contrary to many online tutorials) .......only incredibly high traffic servers should use dynamic after tuning settings?
-
Nginx (SlickStack) vs Open Litespeed benchmarks
To be fair, in this case, SlickStack is the nginx configuration. It's maintained by nginx professionals and is readily available to view in their github repo. He didn't think it was necessary to spell it out in his forum post.
What are some alternatives?
WordOps - Install and manage a high performance WordPress stack with a few keystrokes
archwiki - MediaWiki used on Arch Linux websites (read-only mirror)
wordpress-docker - Full stack (LEMP) Wordpress docker environment for dev and production use
guac-install - Script for installing Guacamole on Ubuntu
sh - A set of bash shell scripts to setup and manage a simple Mail, Web and DNS server using either Ubuntu, Manjaro, Alpine or Debian (WIP)
lnmp - LEMP stack/LAMP stack/LNMP stack installation scripts for CentOS/Redhat Debian and Ubuntu
webhost-setup - Simple makefile scripts to set up a linux server with a webhost (nginx)
wikipedia-mirror - 🌐 Guide and tools to run a full offline mirror of Wikipedia.org with three different approaches: Nginx caching proxy, Kiwix + ZIM dump, and MediaWiki/XOWA + XML dump
demyx - Demyx is a Docker image that automates and manages WordPress installations. Traefik for reverse proxy with Lets Encrypt SSL/TLS. WordPress sites are powered by OpenLiteSpeed/NGINX-PHP and MariaDB.
cloudflare-ddns-updater - Dynamic DNS (DDNS) service based on Cloudflare! Access your home network remotely via a custom domain name without a static IP! Written in pure BASH~
DockSTARTer - DockSTARTer helps you get started with running apps in Docker.