machine
d.rymcg.tech
| machine | d.rymcg.tech | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | |
| 120 | 45 | |
| 0.0% | - | |
| 1.8 | 8.8 | |
| over 2 years ago | 28 days ago | |
| Go | Shell | |
| Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
machine
-
Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods
Your comment gave me the impression that Daniel Walsh made some refutation against that podman-machine is being deprecated, but the Tweet you link to say no such thing, unless it's hidden in some sub-tweet (Twitters UX is horrible to discover things).
Going straight to the source (https://github.com/boot2podman/machine), it says the following:
> DEPRECATED (with huge letters)
> Podman Machine is now deprecated. Users should try using Vagrant instead.
So one can safely assume that podman-machine is in fact getting deprecated.
-
Docker desktop no longer free for large companies
Well yeah, sure, but Docker for Mac/Windows installs the VM, sets up host-guest file shares, papers over networking and VPN stuff, etc.
I was going to say that installing Podman on macOS/Windows leaves the VM as an exercise to the user, but per another comment, there's podman-machine[1], a new-ish built in to setup a VM. However, it's apparently already deprecated (?) and recommends simply 'Vagrant' as an alternative, so seemingly setting up the VM is back to being a user exercise for Podman?
[1]: https://github.com/boot2podman/machine
d.rymcg.tech
-
Docker Compose Examples
> What if the docker daemon is on a storage server and the host volume of /stuff contains, say, 10 terabytes of photo album content?
In this extreme example I think probably a bind mount might make sense, especially if the files are already there. But the named volume would just be stored in /var/lib/docker/volumes/some-volume-name, so as long as that /var/lib has 10TB I don't see the problem.
I can use my sftp container [1] to be able to sftp directly into a volume, but I've not yet transferred 10TB with it :)
[1] https://github.com/EnigmaCurry/d.rymcg.tech/tree/master/sftp
-
Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods
yea, I've mostly come to the same conclusion, podman is a hobby, I can see its potention so I actively track it, but I I do mostly do stuff with vanilla docker and docker-compose, for single one-off installs, and k8s for bigger distributed stuff, either in a VM locally, or on a DigitalOcean dropet(s). I've been collecting my compose files [1]
[1] https://github.com/EnigmaCurry/d.rymcg.tech
What are some alternatives?
cockpit-podman - Cockpit UI for podman containers
podman - Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods.
docker-phoenix-example - A production ready example Phoenix app that's using Docker and Docker Compose.
gitlab-runner
Compose-Examples - Various Docker Compose examples of selfhosted FOSS and proprietary projects.
distribution - The toolkit to pack, ship, store, and deliver container content
opentelemetry-collector-contrib - Contrib repository for the OpenTelemetry Collector
toolbox - Tool for interactive command line environments on Linux
Fleet - Open-source platform for IT, security, and infrastructure teams. (Linux, macOS, Chrome, Windows, cloud, data center)
singularity - Singularity has been renamed to Apptainer as part of us moving the project to the Linux Foundation. This repo has been persisted as a snapshot right before the changes.
podman-compose - a script to run docker-compose.yml using podman