bettercap
Cppcheck
bettercap | Cppcheck | |
---|---|---|
28 | 11 | |
15,681 | 5,454 | |
0.8% | - | |
1.0 | 9.9 | |
24 days ago | 2 days ago | |
Go | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
bettercap
-
bettercap VS petep - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 3 Oct 2023
-
Malware installed in this bluetooth remote?
you can do this with Bettercap
- bettercap hell
-
quicklisp security (or total lack of it)
I've been learning some common lisp, reading through Practical Common Lisp, and it's really neat. People say the good ideas of lisp got adapted in other languages and sure that's true of garbage collection, lambda's and some others, but I'm seeing plenty incredible stuff I haven't seen elsewhere, the condition system that among other things lets you fix and resume your program on exception, real interactive development, flexible object system, macros way more understandable than in other languages with AST macros as in lisp the AST is simple, an expressive dynamic language at high level of ruby and python while being an order of magnitude faster performance. Quicklisp also is really neat, how many other package managers can load new dependencies without restarting your application? And I was learning it with idea that it's not just of historical or hobby interest but legitimately a good choice I can use for new programming projects today for many tasks, but I just learned something that makes it impossible for me to consider, which is complete lack of security of quicklisp. You go to the website and see sha256 hash and PGP signature for quicklisp download, awesome it seems at the security standard you expect for a package manager. But then the actual quicklisp client does all downloads over http with no verification. What this means in practical terms is basically if you use quicklisp, anyone on your local network can easily hack your computer, by MITM (man-in-the-middle) the traffic and serving you backdoored software when you install packages from quicklisp. mitm6 will MITM windows machines on normal networks, bettercap can MITM linux and os x on most networks. Aside from attackers on your local network there's plenty other scenarios, you can go near office of CL using company and set up a open WIFI access point with same name as company wifi and hack their developers, using quicklisp over something like Tor is extremely dangerous at present as it would let the exit node backdoor the packages you download, and then in less likely but still should be protected against scenarios is just if quicklisp.org or any router between you and it is compromised, you can be hacked.
- Grannar från helvetet
- Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks
-
Hacker News top posts: Dec 3, 2022
Bettercap – Swiss Army Knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 Networks\ (5 comments)
Cppcheck
-
Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.
- Cppcheck/Releasenotes.txt
-
Enforcing Memory Safety?
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
-
Check out my tasks.json for C++ of VScode
Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis
-
What are the must-have tools for any C++ developer?
My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.
-
C/C++ pre-commit hooks for static analyzers and linters
and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)
-
Caught signal 11 (SIGSEGV) and signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Start by feeding your codebase to a static analysis tool like cppcheck, to rule out obvious bound-checking mistakes in it.
- How to detect stack corruption in embedded c??
-
Why static analysis on C projects is not widespread already?
Cppcheck is free. I've previously used it with a C++ project.
What are some alternatives?
aircrack-ng - WiFi security auditing tools suite
cpplint - Static code checker for C++
MITMf - Framework for Man-In-The-Middle attacks
gcc-poison - gcc-poison
mitmproxy - An interactive TLS-capable intercepting HTTP proxy for penetration testers and software developers.
stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
wifipumpkin3 - Powerful framework for rogue access point attack.
cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance
pwnagotchi-display-password-plugin - Pwnagotchi plugin to display the most recently cracked password on the Pwnagotchi face
American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer
Metasploit - Metasploit Framework
c-smart-pointers - Smart pointers for the (GNU) C programming language