| bats-core | sh | |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | 24 | |
| 4,636 | 6,855 | |
| 1.2% | - | |
| 8.8 | 6.8 | |
| 3 days ago | about 2 months ago | |
| Shell | Python | |
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
bats-core
Posts with mentions or reviews of bats-core.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-05.
- BATS 1.11.0 released
-
Test Anything Protocol (Tap)
I use Bats which is TAP-compliant (https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core) at work to test CIS Benchmark at servers, it's amazing.
- Bashunit
-
How to get code coverage data out of integration tests
I'm working on a project that utilizes the standard Rust unit tests for some of its tests. However, most of the testing is done through integration tests with Bats (https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core). The Bats tests just run the binary. Is it possible to get code coverage data out of these tests somehow?
-
First time writing bash scripts for work, not sure if this is true elsewhere
There's Bat for automated bash testing. Used it a couple of times! https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core
-
Integration testing docs in GitHub Actions
Bats (Bash Automated Testing System) plus assertion libraries for kubectl
-
Unix bash scripting versus Python - any resources out there for comparisons?
Bash has a testing library. I think it's called BATS (not builtin though).
-
Testing Terraform infra - terratest alternatives?
I'm considering something like BATS, but maybe there are other specialized tools? Ofc I could just write some bash myself and add to that as the time goes on, but there has to be a better way.
-
asdf banned_commands
If you were as confused as I was where "run" is defined and how "output" gets set, and what the heck the bats extension is:
(1) and (2) are answered here:
https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core/blob/master/lib/bats-...
(3) bash automatic testing system.
-
Unix shell script tactics - a style guide
It's probably worth noting, bats-core is a solid testing framework, which allows a lot more serious approach to writing shell. https://github.com/bats-core/bats-core
sh
Posts with mentions or reviews of sh.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-08.
- sh: Python Process Launching
-
Acme.sh runs arbitrary commands from a remote server
I usually replace shell scripts with python (using sh module: https://amoffat.github.io/sh/ for calling other scripts/programs).
-
The Right Way to Run Shell Commands from Python
> sh relies on various Unix system calls and only works on Unix-like operating systems - Linux, macOS, BSDs etc. Specifically, Windows is not supported.
from: https://amoffat.github.io/sh/
-
Anyone have any tips for developing on Windows?
You can even run interpreted languages as a shell. See plumbum or sh for ways to make it a more comfortable shell and ipython for a better version of the shell.
- Python “Sh” Module
-
Argbash – Bash Argument Parsing Code Generator
100% agree. There are some libraries like https://amoffat.github.io/sh/ that aim to make that easier, but they always have some quirks that, funnily enough, are often the corner cases you were hitting in your complicated Bash script in the first place.
-
Unix bash scripting versus Python - any resources out there for comparisons?
Another way to make Python scripts nicer is to use https://github.com/amoffat/sh
- Show HN: Clamshell- an experimental Python based shell
-
Useful Python Modules for us
pdbpp: Improved pdb boltons: assorted python addtions twisted: event driven networking framework sorcery: Dark magic in python, things know where+how they are being called, helps reducing boilerplate sh: Better alternative for subprocess module, much more pythonic taskipy: npm run scipt_name like functionality snoop: pdb lite, record+replay function steps birdseye: graphical debugger remote-pdb: easy pdb from inside containers typer: wrapper around click for simpler code for CLIs arrow: Always TZ aware datetimes, plus more features more-itertools: more functions for iterators pydantic: data validation + dataclasses loguru: better logging notifiers: sending notifications from python
-
What is your favorite ,most underrated 3rd party python module that made your programming 10 times more easier and less code ? so we can also try that out :-) .as a beginner , mine is pyinputplus
Sh sh and outside python, watch watch
What are some alternatives?
When comparing bats-core and sh you can also consider the following projects:
shunit2 - shUnit2 is a xUnit based unit test framework for Bourne based shell scripts.
Delegator.py - Subprocesses for Humans 2.0.
getting-started-with-bash-testing - Example Bash Project to get started with testing with Bats.
envoy
bash-oo-framework - Bash Infinity is a modern standard library / framework / boilerplate for Bash
sarge
bats-assert - Common assertions for Bats
tkterminal - Terminal widget for Tkinter library.
shellharden - The corrective bash syntax highlighter
xonsh - :shell: Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell.
sh - A shell parser, formatter, and interpreter with bash support; includes shfmt
zx - A tool for writing better scripts