bashtickets VS syncthing-android

A nice terminal-based ticketing system. https://github.com/tpapastylianou/bashtickets

v2 on master is as simple as it gets, but still incredibly functional; my team is dogfooding the hell out of it at work.

v3 on the "commandbased" branch is a total rehaul on the works, hoping to make this a more traditional/complete package, with a command-based interface (i.e. similar to how git works)

I created something similar when I had to work in an extremely resource-constrained project (we could only work by ssh'ing to a server with no graphical utilities, and no internet access other than ssh). It has worked like a charm, and I would find it difficult to go back to anything else for ticket management now. I use this for 'in-project tickets/milestones' and leave stuff like github issues for 'external' issues by users.

Here it is on github for anyone who's interested: https://github.com/tpapastylianou/bashtickets

My tool is slightly less minimal than the one in the article, but essentially the same philosophy. Everything is a local file following a simple but fixed template, so that they can be grepped / manipulated if necessary. It plays very well with versioning, and supports milestones and 'advanced queries' as pre-made scripts. Obviously, since the tickets/milestones are simple text, it should be fairly straightforward to write your own queries if you know a bit of bash (or any other language you prefer, obviously).

In fact, this little system has worked so well, that I have recently been trying to convert it to a nice, portable, "command-based" tool, i.e. the way git works; bashtickets init (or just bt init) initialises a ticket repository, bt new ticket creates a new ticket, bt list lists open/closed tickets, or active/completed milestones etc. There's nothing wrong with the original, of course, except for the fact that it's a bit ugly to have a bag of scripts in each ticket repository you want to manage. A command-based interface simply makes it look a bit more 'modern', and clean, putting any pre-made scripts and 'template' files out of sight for peace of mind. This is still very much under development, but please see the "commandbased" branch if interested. I'd be very open to feedback :)

I've got another one on topic of self-hosted file sharing:

- FileBrowser running in Docker (https://filebrowser.org/features)

- Syncthing running in another container (https://syncthing.net/)

Syncthing keeps the files on your PC, Mac, BSD systems updated, and FileBrowser can point to the share and supply a convenient web UI. It works for me, it's kind of like a local Dropbox-lite.

We use syncthing to share files between our machines. It avoids is having to use dropbox / OneDrive etc. You just choose a folder and it automatically syncs it in the background.

https://syncthing.net/

This very hn entries is bust contradicting your statement.

Also what about syncthing[1] (for recurrent/permanent sync) and croc[2] (for one time copies) ?

I have used both for a number of years already.

[1] https://syncthing.net/

[2] https://github.com/schollz/croc

I would use syncthing, which is open source at https://syncthing.net/.

After minimal setup, it just works(tm).

You have a normal directory in your filesystem, that is synced to the other peers (which you set up in the "minimal setup").

I have been using it for years, and it works well. It has no problems crossing os'es (i.e. windows -> linux, linux -> mac)

For windows I usually recommend https://github.com/canton7/SyncTrayzor, but vanilla syncthing works fine too (but don't try to mix them!)

Do consider Syncthing particularly if you are using Android. If using apple iOS you'd need the möbius sync client.

https://syncthing.net/

https://www.mobiussync.com/

One thing that it beats the cloud / centralized sync on is because the connection is direct between devices when the initial transfer is completed the file is completely there on the other device. With a cloud type of sync you do the transfer twice. I've seen stack up on large media or with the structure of cloud services pricing making it expensive depending on how your workflow is setup with inside and outside parties. For example, Dropbox deduction from all parties' storage limits not just the sharer.

You can also point Syncthing at a local sync of Dropbox or Google drive and then forward the files to other recipients from that for some purposes.

I think sync is a non-feature, as you can just ride on your existing solution.

For example, I use syncthing [1] with Obsidian to sync files off-cloud.

https://syncthing.net/

When I was 14 and just getting started, I used Notepad. Upgraded to Wordpad when I realized I loved putting italics in every other sentence, moved to Google Docs at around 25 when I started writing on my phone and wanted to sync with my computer, finally moved to Obsidian a few months ago (with Syncthing for syncing) when I decided I don't want to live in Google's house where they can burn my stuff down whenever they want.