bash-commons VS mo

Compare bash-commons vs mo and see what are their differences.

bash-commons

A collection of reusable Bash functions for handling common tasks such as logging, assertions, string manipulation, and more (by gruntwork-io)

mo

Mustache templates in pure bash (by tests-always-included)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
bash-commons mo
3 3
729 541
1.4% 0.7%
2.1 4.8
5 days ago about 2 months ago
Shell Shell
Apache License 2.0 GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

bash-commons

Posts with mentions or reviews of bash-commons. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-27.
  • Bashkit V1
    38 projects | /r/bash | 27 Jan 2023
  • BashLib a helpful source file for any script
    36 projects | /r/bash | 20 Nov 2022
  • How to structure library?
    2 projects | /r/bash | 7 Aug 2022
    I think I phrased what I said poorly and unintentially communicated that I want to have all my code in one file. that' the opposite of what I'm wanting. To clarify, and I know this is splitting hairs but it illustrates my point. I think this log shell file is a good example of what I want to NOT do with my library. instead of having one file with 5 functions, I think it should be 5 files with no functions. that's to say the new file "log_info" would contain this text:

mo

Posts with mentions or reviews of mo. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-27.
  • Bashkit V1
    38 projects | /r/bash | 27 Jan 2023
  • BashLib a helpful source file for any script
    36 projects | /r/bash | 20 Nov 2022
  • How to use Scala Twirl template engine standalone, without Play Framework
    3 projects | dev.to | 29 Jun 2021
    I recently had to generate multiple configuration files for Apache httpd server. My first choice was Apache Module mod_macro, however, it has too many limitations. My second choice was to use mustache templates and I was super excited that it is also available in bash! Everything seems great until I attempted to use arrays, and it did not work. Most likely because it was implemented for Bash 3.x which is 10 years old. I did not want to mess with my environment by adding or switching to older version of Bash. Because Scala is my weapon of choice, I decided for my third attempt, to try solving this problem using Scala and Twirl templating engine. I know it might seem like an overkill, however, my previous choices have failed me, so I wanted my next attempt to be the final one! 😎

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bash-commons and mo you can also consider the following projects:

bashkit - Official bashkit repository

Mustache - Logic-less Ruby templates.

basher - A package manager for shell scripts.

bashify - few helper functions in bash ( especially string manipulation functions )

balls - Bash on Balls

bash-oo-framework - Bash Infinity is a modern standard library / framework / boilerplate for Bash

awesome-bash - A curated list of delightful Bash scripts and resources.

toolbox - Module framework for Bash

bash3boilerplate - Templates to write better Bash scripts