base16384 VS ultrajson

Compare base16384 vs ultrajson and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
base16384 ultrajson
1 3
111 4,251
- 0.5%
8.2 6.9
about 1 month ago 14 days ago
C C
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

base16384

Posts with mentions or reviews of base16384. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

ultrajson

Posts with mentions or reviews of ultrajson. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-03.
  • Processing JSON 2.5x faster than simdjson with msgspec
    5 projects | /r/Python | 3 Oct 2022
    ujson
  • Benchmarking Python JSON serializers - json vs ujson vs orjson
    2 projects | dev.to | 25 May 2022
    For most cases, you would want to go with python’s standard json library which removes dependencies on other libraries. On other hand you could try out ujsonwhich is simple replacement for python’s json library. If you want more speed and also want dataclass, datetime, numpy, and UUID instances and you are ready to deal with more complex code, then you can try your hands on orjson
  • The fastest tool for querying large JSON files is written in Python (benchmark)
    16 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Apr 2022
    I asked about this on the Github issue regarding these benchmarks as well.

    I'm curious as to why libraries like ultrajson[0] and orjson[1] weren't explored. They aren't command line tools, but neither is pandas right? Is it perhaps because the code required to implement the challenges is large enough that they are considered too inconvenient to use through the same way pandas was used (ie, `python -c "..."`)?

    [0] https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson

What are some alternatives?

When comparing base16384 and ultrajson you can also consider the following projects:

fadec - A fast and lightweight decoder for x86 and x86-64 and encoder for x86-64.

marshmallow - A lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes.

moonlight-common-c - Core implementation of Nvidia's GameStream protocol

greenpass-covid19-qrcode-decoder - An easy tool for decoding Green Pass Covid-19 QrCode

j40 - J40: Independent, self-contained JPEG XL decoder

python-rapidjson - Python wrapper around rapidjson

base64 - Faster base64 encoding for Go

Fast JSON schema for Python - Fast JSON schema validator for Python.

PyLD - JSON-LD processor written in Python

pysimdjson - Python bindings for the simdjson project.

hjson-py - Hjson for Python

serpy - ridiculously fast object serialization