awesome-gitops VS crossplane

https://github.com/weaveworks/awesome-gitops but also, like, a shell script?

There are books (The Path to GitOps, GitOps and Kubernetes or GitOps Cloud-native Continuous Deployment), whitepapers, and more blog posts than we can manage to count but let us elaborate on the GitOps purpose by taking a quick look on how things evolved in the last few years.

Websites such as awesome-gitops, which was launched by Weaveworks, or gitops.tech, which was put together by INNOQ employees, provide an introductory overview of the available tools. When you take a closer look, you will see that the listed tools can be used to perform a wide variety of tasks related to implementing GitOps, and of course they also differ from one another in terms of their adoption, maturity, and how actively they are maintained. This article identifies three categories from the various use cases: Tools for Kubernetes, supplementary tools, and tools close to infrastructure. In addition, we compiled a table that summarizes the tools and their properties. The tables also contain various Git and GitHub-based metrics (current as of February 2021) that allow you to better assess their adoption, maturity, and how actively they are maintained.

huge fan of k8s. drop what you're doing & use a cross-system object-storage/"apiserver" & control-loops to automate everything; embrace desired state management & thank me latter. but, Heroku &al have a lot of value left.

there's just not that many folk trying to tame deploys on k8s via gitops. flux2 is the rage, it's all over the alpha geek's efforts[1], but it's usually used by someone carefully authoring a fairly complex Helm file, then building out a significant Flux2 HelmRelease object (ex: [2]).

there's a bunch of other tools[3], & i'm frankly not familiar enough. but this idea of having a bunch of source that can deploy itself, simply, is still extremely rare even among the alpha-geek #gitops types. i'm sure some of these tools better match the simplicity of the Heroku model, corresponding branches to environments, which makes so so much sense, but so far i feel like such attempts are still basically unknown.

heroku's really simmered it down to something that made extremely natural sense. huge props to that. too too much of this effort had to go into creating buildpacks & supporting language environments very very carefully very actively, that ability to stealth-containerize an app & not even notice is so much of the special sauce that makes this a hard, hard & eternal problem (because langauges/envs keep changing). there's still a lot of ease of use to Heroku that's potentially will be underrated and/or lost by the oncoming generations. i have high respect for how operateable Heroku is.

[1] https://github.com/k8s-at-home/awesome-home-kubernetes

[2] https://github.com/onedr0p/home-cluster/blob/main/cluster/ap...

[3] https://github.com/weaveworks/awesome-gitops#tools

did anyone adopt in production https://crossplane.io ?

- https://github.com/crossplane/crossplane/blob/master/design/one-pager-composition-environment.md

In the overall scheme of things , look at services like backstage.io , crossplane.io and opslevel.com to get ideas. This is not necessarily an endorsement of the services. If all you want is to handle cloud resources and that's it, Terraform can be enough with what ever flavor of web technologies you and your team are comfortable with and can support it along the way. Doesn't take much to create a js based website to collect data from a form, or use other means to collecting data as long as its recorded and transparent for accountability.

XRs are written in a fully declarative manner. And when I am building my XR from underlying managed resources provided by some crossplane provider I need to parametrize resources, use conditionals and create arrays of resuorces The issues of declarativeness in the world of automation are well known- we typically resort to some form of templating and we invent some imperative expressions into that templating language/format. This is currently not very well supported with Crossplane however Crossplane team realizes this issue and they are conteptualizing solution here

I have an idea for a project that would interface with Crossplane. The project has some code that would save tons of time if I could use it directly in my project, but it is located in the internal directory. I can't import the modules directly, but the project is open sourced under an Apache 2.0 license, so the code itself is available for use under that license.

There are always new projects like crossplane that sit on top on architecture systems like terraform, vagrant. The pressure to abstract away any sort of resources is mounting, companies can save a lot by for example by alt hosting S3 endpoints. The train is going the direction not to tie anything to a specific platform implementation if its not a must. Most of the companies I work with use AWS as a hosting provider, but Microsoft for github and related CI matters. As I learned, AWS quality is very dependent on location, eu-central-1 is dead stable for our use cases serving about millions requests a day.

Practically, you'll be replacing stock k8s resources (deployments) with custom ones like Argo Rollouts with Keda autoscaling, so you have to plan the respective Gitops CD pipeline (fluxcd/argocd with some crossplane), as well.