awesome-chatgpt-prompts VS langchain

Aside from the built-in prompts powered by awesome-chatgpt-prompts (Are you an ETH dev, a financial analyst, or a personal trainer today?), you can also create, share and debug your chat tools with prompt templates.

I've found the following resources helpful:

- 15 Rules For Crafting Effective GPT Chat Prompts (https://expandi.io/blog/chat-gpt-rules/)

- Awesome ChatGPT Prompts (https://github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts)

For more resources of like nature, you can search for "mega prompt".

Someone assembled an adhoc page in Github that is amassing quite a large library of prompt ideas [Github]

I like to use PromptLayer for this. But you could easily set up a simple CRUD web app to track prompts/average completion token # length, different variations.

There is also awesome-chatgpt-prompts (https://github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts) which has some interesting ones. What are you looking for?

* Built-In Prompts: Channel creativity using integrated prompts sourced from github.com/f/awesome-chatgpt-prompts.

So, I jumped into the ChatGPT fitness wagon to generate a New And Improved® workout that will have a mix of bodybuilding and calisthenics. I used a pre-made prompt to generate a PPL+FB and specified things like fitness leve, equipment, schedules, etc. in order to make if fit my current status. From there I made it fit some of my needs and chose some exercises that I wanted to do every day: wrist and core.

Langchain and the implementation of Custom Tools also is a great (and very efficient) way to setup a dedicated Q&A (for example for chat purpose) agent.

We're using it via langchain talking to Amazon Bedrock which is hosting Claude 1.x. It's comparable to GPT3.x, not bad. The integration doesn't seem to be fully there though, I think langchain is expecting "Human:" and "AI:", but Claude uses "Assistant:".

https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/issues/2638

Depending on how much work you want to put into it, you can get started at HuggingFace with their models and datasets, but you'd need compute power, multiple MLOps, etc. I was introduced to the concept in this video, since Google has their Vertex AI tools on Google Cloud, and there's always LangChain but I'm not sure about anything recent.

a documentation chatbot proof of concept using GPT3.5 and LangChain

I encourage everyone to pay attention to the Langchain open-source project and leverage it to achieve tasks that ChatGPT cannot handle.

Yeah I never know where memory goes exactly in langchain, it's not exactly clear all the time. But sure, the main insight I remember is this, take a look at their MULTI_PROMPT_ROUTER_TEMPLATE: https://github.com/hwchase17/langchain/blob/560c4dfc98287da1...

It's a lot of instructions for an LLM, they seem to forget an LLM is an auto-completion machine, and which data it is trained on. Using <<>> for sections is not a normal thing, it's not markdown, which probably the thing read way more often on the internet, instead of open json comments, why not type signatures, instead of so many rules, why not give it examples? It is an autocomplete machine!

They are relying too much on the LLM being smart because they probably only test stuff in GPT-4 and 3.5, but with GPT4All models this prompt was not working at all, so I had to rewrite it, for simple routing, we don't even need json, carying the `next_inputs` here is weird if you don't need it.

So this is my version of it: https://gist.github.com/rogeriochaves/b67676977eebb1936b9b5c...

It's so basic it's dumb, yet it is more powerful, as it does not rely on GPT-4 level intelligence, it's just what I needed