autoscaler VS Kyverno

We use Cluster Autoscaler to automatically adjust the number of nodes (cluster size) based on your actual usage to ensure efficiency. Additionally, we deploy Vertical and Horizontal Pod Autoscalers to scale your applications' resources as their needs change automatically.

> * Hetzner: cheap, good service, the finest pets in the world, no cattle

You can absolutely do cattle with Hetzner. They support imaging and immutable infrastructure. They don't have a native auto scaling equivalent, but if you're using Kubernetes, they have a cluster autoscaler: https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/cluster...

Here we take the VPA as a starting point to analyze the design and implementation principles of the VPA in Autoscaler. The source code for this article is based on Autoscaler HEAD fbe25e1.

Autoscaling over EKS can be accomplished using either the cluster-autoscaler project or Karpenter. If you want to use Spot instances, consider using Karpenter, as it has better integrations with AWS for optimizing spot pricing and availability, minimizing interruptions, and falling back to on-demand nodes if no spot instances are available.

Autoscaling is already provided on OVH, but we don't use it for now. Autoscaler has to be manually installed on the AWS/EKS cluster.

do you mean this: https://github.com/kubernetes/autoscaler/blob/master/vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/recommender/README.md

Read more about this scaler in detail here!

We have a default node group of Linux hosts, but there's a secondary nodegroup of Windows hosts that is typically scaled down to 0. When a team's build runs, a pod is scheduled based on their definition. Cluster-autoscaler will check the nodeSelector and automatically spin up a node from that nodegroup if necessary.

I am running a Kubernetes cluster(AWS EKS one) with Autoscaler pod So that Cluster will autoscale according to the resource request within the cluster.

Anyway, I haven’t checked for sure as I’m away from laptop but it should be possible to use something like Kyverno to block that operation. We had to do similar in the past to hotfix a bug in our CLI tool. I wrote a blog post about it that might give you an idea: https://www.giantswarm.io/blog/restricting-cluster-admin-permissions

Cosign is used for signing containers through a variety of different methods. It has strong integration with other open source tools, such as Kyverno.

cosign: https://docs.sigstore.dev/cosign/overview/ kyverno: https://kyverno.io/

Kyverno - Kubernetes Native Policy Management

You could use a policy tool like kyverno or OPA.

Kyverno is present in the management cluster;

You do still have to create a policy for every namespace, but don't have to worry about labeling individual pods. We're starting to move to Helm/kustomize for our namespaces to deploy default things like network policies to each one, and we're also starting to use kyverno more, which I think is a little more purpose built for this type of thing than metacontroller is.

I knew it was unsupported so about 6 months ago I had started an effort to switch to Kyverno, which is far better and actually supported. The version of Kyverno I was using had a v1beta1 AdmissionController. Fortunately that was in a helm chart so easily caught by pluto before my upgrade.

Kyverno Kyverno is a policy engine designed for Kubernetes, Kyverno policies can validate, mutate, and generate Kubernetes resources plus ensure OCI image supply chain security.