autoprefixer VS browserslist

Do you use Autoprefixer? https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer

Simple, fast, and a little bit opinionated, Eleventy Plus Vite features Eleventy 2.0.0-canary, the new Eleventy 2.0 Dev Server with live reload, Vite 3.0 as Middleware in Eleventy Dev Server (using eleventy-plugin-vite), build output post-processing by Vite (with Rollup), CSS/Sass post-processing with PostCSS including Autoprefixer and cssnano, a custom CSS/Sass structure, basic fluid typography based on Utopia, dark mode support, an RSS feed, XML sitemap, and — to top it off — perfect scores on Lighthouse.

w/ postcss-preset-env(v7.8.3): convert modern CSS into something most browsers can understand, determining the polyfills you need based on your targeted browsers or runtime environments. It takes the support data that comes from MDN and Can I Use and determine from a browserlist whether those transformations are needed. It also packs Autoprefixer within and shares the list with it, so prefixes are only applied when you're going to need them given your browser support list.

As others have said, you need to normalize. Also, you may need something like autoprefixer if you're using styles that have different vendor prefixes. https://github.com/postcss/autoprefixer

Mmm maybe it's not gap then, maybe it's some other property. Maybe autoprefixer could help. Or polyfills, as other user suggested.

Of course, we have great tooling for that: Autoprefixer, PostCSS and Stylelint for CSS transformation, Babel and Webpack for JavaScript transpilation and bundling, ESLint for code analysis, and many others.

Bulma uses autoprefixer to make (most) Flexbox…

Not these days, where most people are using evergreen browsers and iOS users upgrade very quickly.

Take a look at the defaults for browserslist, for example:

https://browsersl.ist/#q=defaults

It just barely supports Safari 15, on iOS only, and that’s likely to go away imminently because it’s under 1% usage.

browserslist

We compile JS only for modern browsers. The list of default browsers in Next can be overridden in your browserslist.

In the latest versions of Next.js, targeting specific browsers or features is a breeze using the Browserslist configuration in your package.json file. The latest version of Next.js (v13) uses the following configuration by default:

For a more general answer to browser support, check out https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist. That seems to be standard tool to help you with that.

As someone else pointed out, you're overestimating Chrome/ium's market share.

Regardless, after the web.dev/baseline announcement, I looked at Browslerlist and one of our site's analytics and it is shocking how many people are not using the last two versions of evergreen browsers. There is a long tail of browser versions in those stats.

https://browsersl.ist

The way folks handle this in production is with browserslist, which lets you query on different things you want to support: https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist. This in turn tells other parts of your tooling what language features to transpile for production.

I imagine tools could be built on top of that which do what you’re asking too

# .browserslist.rc # Babel Preset configuration # -------------------------- # Defines web-browser compatibility parameters for Babel to transpile your JS code. # This configuration is used by babel.config.js. # More information in here. # https://github.com/browserslist/browserslist # Support browsers with a market share higher than 5% >10%