autopilot VS VectorTileExporter

Thanks for sharing your work! Let’s connect cause it seems we are exploring a similar space. Here’s the project I have been working on: https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot

- https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot/issues/178 (the code is mostly correct, minus a minor change in the package that was updated and gpt doesn't know. It was almost a copy-paste).

Code Autopilot is an AI-powered tool designed to tackle software engineering tasks. It shares similarities with Github Copilot, but with some key distinctions: - It derives context from your entire codebase, enabling it to handle complex tasks spanning multiple files. - It integrates with your Github account to obtain context and respond to issues you open. - The core technology is open-source, from https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot

Consider using autopilot for coding https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot It’s open source In my tests it works with gpt-3.5 but gpt-4 gives much better/reliable answers. Problem is the price difference

The solution I found was to create an agent that summarises all the files in a project and then a sequence of agents that picks the necessary code/folders for a task. That way I was able to provide the required context and then let GPT do its magic. The project is public at: https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot

Check what we are doing in https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot we have multiple use cases were we ask gpt 3.5 to reply in JSON

Link to project: https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot

I developed a too for the same problem but with a slightly different approach: https://github.com/fjrdomingues/autopilot It uses multiple GPT calls to get context on the codebase and when you give it a task it uses the context to understand where to implement the code changes and suggests the code to implement. It would be great to merge the best of both project

Vectortiles to GeoJSON\ (0 comments)