auto-check-element
catalyst
auto-check-element | catalyst | |
---|---|---|
1 | 8 | |
176 | 1,361 | |
0.6% | 0.7% | |
6.1 | 4.6 | |
16 days ago | 10 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
auto-check-element
-
GitHub's Web Component Collection
This is a simple ES6 question.
Why would folks use const inside a loop?
I mean, isn't const means a constant that is not going to be changed? When inside a loop, it is changed every iteration, ain't it?
https://github.com/github/auto-check-element/blob/main/examp...
Can someone enlight me?
I would rather use `let`.
catalyst
-
The Invokers Are Coming
Reminds me of GitHub catalyst web component framework, which has targets & actions. https://github.com/github/catalyst
-
Node-Secure v0.9.0
Working on the next Web UI (TypeScript + Catalyst).
-
Introducing: Custom Elements Manifest
Catalyst (opt-in via CLI flag)
-
Why jQuery should be more appreciated
They actually use a web component system, with a library called Catalyst used to make things a bit easier. They aren't simply doing raw DOM manipulation in Vanilla JavaScript, they're using components and what is essentially a fairly lightweight framework.
-
GitHub's Web Component Collection
Personally, I'd really like to see the unmolested, with-dependencies versions[1].
This version is VERY easy to ship and adopt. But in my mind, these components hide how the sausage is made! Many were built with a library (Catalyst[2]), but the tools were obfuscated out in these end products.
There's a huge amount to be said for these web components. We need more models like this. But I also think there's an opportunity lost here, to teach, to inform, to help others learn how to build components, using the tech Github actually used to develop them.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26439167
[2] https://github.com/github/catalyst
- new @attr decorator for class fields | Github/Catalyst#103
-
Getting Up & Running with GitHub Catalyst
GitHub Catalyst is a library that makes it easier to develop Web Components.
-
Project Lightspeed: A self-contained, sub-second, open source live stream platform
The only real escape is using something like /r/webcomponents. I did some playing around with Github's new Catalyst framework over the holidays, quite enjoyed it. But you'd be one of the only people on the planet using it. Stick with whatever works for you.
What are some alternatives?
github-elements - GitHub's Web Component collection.
stencil - A toolchain for building scalable, enterprise-ready component systems on top of TypeScript and Web Component standards. Stencil components can be distributed natively to React, Angular, Vue, and traditional web developers from a single, framework-agnostic codebase.