auto-changelog-action
By charmixer
gnulib
upstream mirror (by coreutils)
| auto-changelog-action | gnulib | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 68 | 264 | |
| - | 1.1% | |
| 0.0 | 9.8 | |
| about 1 year ago | about 15 hours ago | |
| Shell | C | |
| MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
auto-changelog-action
Posts with mentions or reviews of auto-changelog-action.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-05.
-
Git-cliff: generate changelog files from the Git history
We’ve been using charmixer/auto-changelog-action to generate release notes. This action makes nice references to GitHub pull requests. The release notes are attached to a GitHub release by an action. This turns out to be an invaluable reference for SQA and Product Manager for testing and creating customer-facing release notes.
One downside is that we run into trouble with GitHub API rate-limiting.
https://github.com/charmixer/auto-changelog-action
gnulib
Posts with mentions or reviews of gnulib.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-28.
-
sha256sum written in Python faster than GNU version in C?
This appears to be the coreutil code.
-
Git-cliff: generate changelog files from the Git history
gnulib and a lot of GNU projects have this for a long time. https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/build-aux/gi...
- How do you confirm action on command line?
-
Do the coreutils rely on each other to work?
do_move calls a copy function from copy.c , which ends up in calling a renameatu function which ends up calling a SYS_renameat2 system call
-
why is dd so slow??
https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/lib/stat-size.h#L20-L21 ST_BLKSIZE(s): Preferred (in the sense of best performance) I/O blocksize for the file, in bytes.
-
https://np.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/mjepb0/why_is_dd_so_slow/gtalvhp/
https://github.com/coreutils/gnulib/blob/master/lib/stat-size.h#L20-L21
-
why are the executables, [ and test, a 4 kb difference?
So what do they do? Well, let's have a look:
What are some alternatives?
When comparing auto-changelog-action and gnulib you can also consider the following projects:
GitHub Changelog Generator - Automatically generate change log from your tags, issues, labels and pull requests on GitHub.
coreutils - upstream mirror
git-cliff - A highly customizable Changelog Generator that follows Conventional Commit specifications ⛰️