authelia VS zitadel

It's me and two others though I'm definitely the most active. We put a lot of effort into security best practices and one of my co-developers is currently reviewing the 4.38.0 release. It's a fairly major release with a lot of important code paths that have been improved for the future.

Our official docs can be found at https://www.authelia.com and you can find docs for a particular PR in the relevant PR. We've also linked the pre-release docs in the pre-release discussions which can be found here: https://github.com/authelia/authelia/discussions/categories/...

I use NGINX proxy with Authelia in between. Authelia blocks and blacklists faulty logins.

https://github.com/saltstack/salt https://github.com/chocolatey/choco https://github.com/nextcloud https://github.com/authelia/authelia https://github.com/grafana/grafana

If you are using HAProxy on PfSense/OPNSense, see my issue https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/2696

https://github.com/lldap/lldap is a very simple and lightweight LDAP solution. Works flawless with https://www.authelia.com/

Ah yeah, so I guess it's been a while since I tried and I forgot where I got stuck last time. Authelia's config.yml is absolutely massive and I'm not sure which section of their guide I should be following. In The Docker Compose section, there's "Unbundled", "Lite", and "Local". I think I want to be running the "lite" bundle, but their example compose file has a ton of Traefik stuff in it. I know I wouldn't keep the Traefik services, but do I need either secure or public?

Authelia supports SSO. If you are behind a reverse proxy it’s quite straightforward to integrate.

This should probably also be mentioned in the documentation so maybe consider mentioning this on their discussion page.

Im one of the authors of ZITADEL the open source identity and access management solution.

An other Keycloak alternative would be our (I am one of the founders) project ZITADEL.

You could take a look at https://zitadel.ch/ Or curity https://curity.io/product/

I'm biased since I work for ZITADEL (https://github.com/caos/zitadel). Passwordless with FIDO2 has been baked in since the beginning. I reckon that the major Open Source alternatives provide support as well. FIDO2 should work on all major OS and browsers.

And a bigger project i know is zitadel (https://github.com/caos/zitadel)

https://zitadel.ch/ https://github.com/caos/zitadel/

Full disclosure: My company is building ZITADEL, an open source alternative for Auth0 or Keycloak (both still very good, with some drawbacks). https://github.com/caos/zitadel/

We are building a cloud-native IAM over here https://github.com/caos/zitadel

It is written in Go and built around event sourcing for a great audit trail. We already support OIDC, Passwordless, RBAC and working on more features each day.

For those who want to run it on-prem we have a kubernetes operator ready in the next few weeks who also manages the database (cockroach).

We run our own service here https://zitadel.ch with a free tier as well

Feel free to engage with us on GitHub discussions.

I'm not sure if it makes sense to build your own oauth/oidc server. It's fun to learn all these techniques but you have to maintain much more code. You also have to implement security mechanisms from dev and ops perspectives. There are existing implementations. If you want to check out an existing open source implementation in go you could take a look at the implementaion of my company called zitadel. I would love to answer question if there are any.