auger VS bore

I created a tool that forwards localhost traffic to a remote server. The server is self-hostable, but I also set up an instance at tnl.pub so you can, for example, run: ```auger client 8080 --to tnl.pub``` and you would be able to access your localhost port 8080 on tnl.pub.

bore - Minimal tunneling solution. MIT Licensed. Written in Rust.

Could look into pre-configuring something like https://github.com/ekzhang/bore

Honestly didn't know about SSH tunnels lol. I was using https://github.com/ekzhang/bore and wanted to make an alternative with options that better suit my use case (deployed with caprover) and to learn more about networking. u/SleepingProcess made a good point that SSH may not always be available.

This is lovely. Can you please add support for bore too?

%cd /content/naifu !pip install virtualenv && bash ./setup.sh !curl -Ls https://github.com/ekzhang/bore/releases/download/v0.4.0/bore-v0.4.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.gz | tar zx -C /usr/bin !curl -Lo /usr/bin/cloudflared https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflared/releases/latest/download/cloudflared-linux-amd64 && chmod +x /usr/bin/cloudflared !/content/naifu/venv/bin/python -m pip install -qq pytorch_lightning==1.7.7

bore local 3000 --to bore.pub

Wireguard itself can help you out with the task of forwarding traffic or creating an overlay network. There's also ngrok and tailscale for forwarding traffic and doing NAT traversal. Except for wireguard, these are commercial platforms, the open source alternatives I know of, are (respectively):

- https://bore.pub && https://sslip.io

The Kaggle keeps failing to connect to bore.pub, and gives me the error of 'nonetype'. Is this a new thing, or is something just...wrong? I've verified my phone, the settings are correct, and I pressed that succulent triangle. It just ends up dead.

I recommend reading through the source code for bore! https://github.com/ekzhang/bore