Atomizer
linaria
Atomizer | linaria | |
---|---|---|
17 | 46 | |
1,526 | 11,189 | |
0.1% | 0.5% | |
9.0 | 8.4 | |
29 days ago | 5 days ago | |
JavaScript | TypeScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Atomizer
-
Are you still using the ternary operator to dynamically apply Tailwind styles?
Tailwind CSS is a CSS framework that has gained incredible popularity, with usage skyrocketing 40% in three years, according to the State of CSS 2022. It offers benefits such as development speed, maintainability, and gzip optimization. As a result, it is expected to exceed 50% in the 2023 survey. However, the readability of Tailwind CSS decreases sharply as the style becomes more complex, which is a typical disadvantage of the utility-first approach. Personally, I recommend my library, CSS Lube, but in this article, I would like to introduce some simple tips that can improve the developer experience when using the Atomic CSS approach.
-
Mengenal macam - macam Metodologi penulisan CSS - Part 2
Dokumentasi resmi ACSS: https://acss.io/
-
Getting started with a whole new CSS language —— Master CSS
Language - Master is a language, but it was originally inspired by ACSS's concept of atomic classes.
-
Setting up a dev environment with React, Vite, and Tailwind
Tailwind and React are two leading technologies in their sphere. Tailwind CSS simplifies the concept of Atomic CSS, enabling developers to style their UI by adding some classes to their markup. And with the performance improvements that come with the new JIT compiler, Tailwind CSS has become a clear developer's favorite.
-
Got Messy Spaghetti Stylesheets? 4 Techniques for Managing CSS Complexity
Atomic frameworks like Atomic CSS and Tailwind takes a single purpose approach to selectors, so CSS properties are naturally never overlapping – this is also why Tailwind's @apply is an anti-pattern when overused.
-
What is Tailwind? And how to set it up properly.
It sure is ugly-looking but it works well! Drawing inspiration from Atomic CSS and utility classes (1 class = 1 style), Tailwind makes a few strong design decisions:
-
5 CSS methodologies you need to know in 2022
Atomic CSS is the approach to CSS architecture that favors small, single-purpose classes with names based on visual function.
- How long did you spend on css?
-
Is styling supposed to be so damn difficult?
There are all kinds of approaches people take to maintain clean HTML/CSS, such as BEM or Atomic CSS.
-
The React roadmap for beginners you never knew you needed.
Atomic
linaria
-
How we improved page load speed for Next.js ecommerce website by 1.5 times
The code duplication occurred due to disabling the default code splitting algorithm in Next.js. Previous developers used this approach to make Linaria work, which is designed to improve productivity. However, disabling code splitting led to a decrease in performance.
-
An Overview of 25+ UI Component Libraries in 2023
KumaUI : Another relatively new contender, Kuma uses zero runtime CSS-in-JS to create headless UI components which allows a lot of flexibility. It was heavily inspired by other zero runtime CSS-in-JS solutions such as PandaCSS, Vanilla Extract, and Linaria, as well as by Styled System, ChakraUI, and Native Base. ### Vue
-
Why Tailwind CSS Won
I like Linaria [0] because your IDE typechecks your styles and gives you autocomplete/intellisense when typing styles. With Tailwind you have to look everything up in docs because it's all strings, not importable constants. Leads to a lot of bugs from typos that aren't a thing with type checked styles.
[0] https://github.com/callstack/linaria
-
I've decided to go back to using the Pages Router for now (long post)
And if you're wondering why I'm not using something like Linaria or some other runtime-less CSS-in-JS tool, it's simply because I don't want to have to spend my time setting things up and working around stuff and all that jazz. I just want something that works, and I've already got a personal scaffold for getting SC to work out of the box with Next, so, right now, it's either that or sticking to CSS/SCSS/SASS. For me, that is. I know it's such a small thing, but, honestly, one less headache for me is 2 steps forward.
- What's the best option these days for CSS in JS?
-
How bad is it to use CSS-in-JS with regards to the future of React?
I know that there are solutions that generate static css files (like vanilla-extract or linaria), but neither of them work with app router currently (1, 2).
-
JSS vs Styled Components? and why?
If you really want tighter interaction with JS, try a zero-runtine solution like linaria
-
What is the best CSS framework to use with React? why?
https://github.com/callstack/linaria is objectively the best. It's 100% styled component compatible, but with zero runtime which not only makes it substantially faster, but also makes it easy to do things like server side rendering, etc.
-
Why is tailwind so hyped?
tags inside SFCs are typically injected as native
</code> tags during development to support hot updates. <strong>For production they can be extracted and merged into a single CSS file.</strong></p> </blockquote> <p>There are also 3rd party CSS libs that do the same thing such as <a href="https://linaria.dev/">linaria</a>, <a href="https://vanilla-extract.style/">vanilla-extract</a>, and <a href="https://compiledcssinjs.com/">compiled CSS</a>. Which can be used in the event you're stuck with something that doesn't have baked in support via SFC formats (looking at you React).</p> <p>These are my preferred ways of handing it.</p> <ol> <li>Tailwind</li> </ol> <p>Option 2 is tailwind, which works backwards.</p> <p>That is, instead of the above with extraction where you write the styles, and the framework or libs extract them and replace them with class names, it's the other way around.</p> <p>You're writing class names first (which are essentially aggregated CSS property-values) which then generate and/or reference styles.</p> <p>It has the advantage of being easy to write (assuming you've got editor LSP, linting, etc), but as you've discovered, it's difficult to read / can get really messy really fast.</p> <p>As far as all the other claims on the Tailwind site, it's all marketing, at least 80% bullshit.</p> </div>
- Individual css for every component?
What are some alternatives?
PostCSS - Transforming styles with JS plugins
emotion - 👩🎤 CSS-in-JS library designed for high performance style composition
React CSS Modules - Seamless mapping of class names to CSS modules inside of React components.
Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapid UI development.
React Inline
styled-components - Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅
vanilla-extract - Zero-runtime Stylesheets-in-TypeScript
CSS Layout - A collection of popular layouts and patterns made with CSS. Now it has 100+ patterns and continues growing!
classnames - A simple javascript utility for conditionally joining classNames together
Neutrino - Create and build modern JavaScript projects with zero initial configuration.