ASP.NET Core VS CodeBehind Framework

This approach to organizing middleware enhances code readability, maintainability, and reusability. By following this encapsulation pattern, you're adhering to best practices in ASP.NET Core development, ensuring your application remains well-organized and scalable.

🌟.NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET 9 Preview 2 Discussion ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 Release Notes ➡️EF Core updates in .NET 9 Preview 2 ➡️.NET Aspire preview 4 - .NET Aspire

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/50643

Even if you look at Microsoft’s by far most popular GitHub project, they’re still only half as big as SupaBase. If you believe “the SupaBase story”, SupaBase grew and became twice as large as Microsoft in 3 years. Below is their likes over time if you’re curious, together with a couple of additional “too good to be true” Silicon Valley projects.

https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/10117

To achieve these objectives, we will take inspiration from ASP.NET Core Identity's PasswordHasher class. It incorporates a concept of hash versioning, allowing only the number of iterations to be modified.

yes I watched several courses, may be aim not getting clearly. but i worked with asp.net which uses http call and firebase cloud function also which uses socket connection, for socket connection its makes sense to use observable bcoz there streams of data we can observe once the connection establish ,but for http it need to be call every time.

As I'm not utilizing ASP.NET, despite its resource-intensive nature and occasional unpredictability, I prefer the cost-free option. I'm hesitant to invest in EPPlus or engage in trials, and moreover, I am more proficient with Interop. Given the limited volume of records in my department, there's a preference for utilizing tools covered by our existing license. This avoids the need for navigating through layers of approval within the chain of command and ensures compliance with our contractual agreements and Microsoft's patch management, ultimately aligning with a cost-saving mindset.

Elanat CMS is a large and powerful content management system based on ASP.NET Core. Elanat CMS is a CMS-Framework that does not use any of the default ASP.NET Core frameworks (Razor Pages, MVC, Blazor). Elanat CMS is built under CodeBehind Framework. Elanat CMS and CodeBehind Framework both belong to Elanat team.

When the modular name comes in ASP.NET Core, we have to use the CodeBehind framework. If you think the default MVC in ASP.NET Core has this modular feature, please leave a comment in the comments section.

About 8 months have passed since the birth of the CodeBehind framework. In these 8 months, we have released 29 new versions with revolutionary innovations, performance improvements and new features; we have now released version 2.4; CodeBehind framework version 2.4 is the 30th version of this framework.

In this article, we want to teach you how to submit form data in the CodeBehind framework. To keep it simple, we just added a View page with a Controller class and didn't use a Model.

CodeBehind Website

In this article, we discuss the disadvantages of MVC architecture in ASP.NET Core; at the same time, we compare the wonderful architecture of the CodeBehind framework with ASP.NET Core. For each disadvantage of MVC in ASP.NET Core, we will give an example and we will also add the corresponding example with the CodeBehind framework.

By studying the CodeBehind framework GitHub repository, you can get enough information about the structure of this framework and compare it with ASP.NET Core.

In this article, we want to teach you how to put these static templates into the powerful CodeBehind framework and make them dynamic.

We first explain the concept of a module, then teach how to create a module in a project built using the CodeBehind framework.