asciinema-player
vt-clj
| asciinema-player | vt-clj | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 2 | |
| 2,584 | 35 | |
| 0.2% | - | |
| 8.8 | 10.0 | |
| 6 days ago | almost 5 years ago | |
| JavaScript | Clojure | |
| Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
asciinema-player
-
Asciinema 3.0 will be rewritten in Rust
The player is still in SolidJS.
https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-player/blob/develop/p...
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29387761
The Rust frontend frameworks have been creeping up the perf charts, though.
- Asciinema: Record and share your terminal sessions, the simple way
-
VHS: CLI Home Video Recorder
You can record and play cast files offline easily. You can also embed an asciinema js player on your own site to play casts.
[1] https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-player
-
4x Smaller, 50x Faster
Feel free to report a bug here https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-player/issues/new (including browser version, OS would help a lot).
Btw, it's not a product, just a side, hobby project of mine.
-
[AskJS] How would you go about recording and replaying data with accurate timing for manual testing?
Take a look at https://github.com/asciinema/asciinema-player
vt-clj
-
4x Smaller, 50x Faster
Perhaps, you should ask a question, why didn't the author reverse the question? Something like "How on earth was my implementation in a JITed language 50x slower on a warmed-up benchmark?" Where is the output of the profiler showing the exact bottlenecks? Of course, you can look at the repo and deduce some stuff, but it is a good habit to mention some key points about the environment such as compiler/ language/ browser versions, compiler settings, the hardware used etc.
Could he use more appropriate data structures? Could he avoid all the schema stuff that doesn't really improve the readability? Could he use better data structures later avoiding slow functions like update-in and migrating the bottlenecks to transducers and transients perhaps?
The author just did a rewrite and that is totally ok. He is trying things out and that is also quite alright. He provided some rather high-level benchmarks that would be really time consuming the reproduce and explain in more detail.
We have looked at the cljs code (e.g. https://github.com/asciinema/vt-clj/blob/master/src/asciinem...) with my colleague and it definitely isn't the best possible Clojure(Script) code around from a readability nor it seems performance standpoint.
To summarize, good that @sickill got a discussion going but it is best to step back and think about it in more depth. We all should apply more of this "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagan_standard
-
Asciinema rewrite from clojurescript to js&rust
This appear to be the source for the ClojureScript: https://github.com/asciinema/vt-clj
What are some alternatives?
Immer - Create the next immutable state by mutating the current one
asciinema - Terminal session recorder 📹
terminalizer - 🦄 Record your terminal and generate animated gif images or share a web player
shadow-cljs - ClojureScript compilation made easy
Fable: F# |> BABEL - F# to JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Rust and Dart Compiler
git-branchless - High-velocity, monorepo-scale workflow for Git
vhs - Your CLI home video recorder 📼
asciinema2gif - Convert ASCIInema asciicast v2 files to animated GIFs