arm-trusted-firmware VS ixy-languages

I have a PinePhone Pro, and I'm trying to figure out a reasonable way to get more than one half of ten minutes of battery life out of it, while still receiving notifications. I figure the best route to go will be to create a service that holds ports open, while the CPU is completely asleep, and either run it on the modem's processor or, as an possibility for the PinePhone Pro, but not the original Pinephone, run it on the m0 core used for power management.

Arm v7 was a Wild West, but with v8, Arm tried to standardize a lot. The Arm Trusted Firmware is the reference boot firmware implementation for v8+ CPUs: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware.

I'd think most of the referece documents can be discovered from that code base.

Relatedly, from the perspective of hands-on programming, the System Programmer's guide is the manual to start with.

I assure you that there is no lack of skill; that is just what happens over the course of ten years in a 300,000 line code-base and multiple hundreds of contributors: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware/blob/master/Makefile

The ARM Trusted Firmware is what typically runs in the secure world, and it is indeed open source: https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

ROM code generally speaking is not open source, but has been dumped on occasion.

The reference Trustzone implementation for ARM is open source https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware , so I really can't think of some reason the ARM license would have to do with it.

SMP support (at least as far as CPU suspend and hotplug goes) is usually handled by TrustZone firmware on aarch64, not by the kernel (see PSCI). If you write your own OS on a bare-metal platform you can of course do what you want, but if you're looking for existing sources that's where you'd have to look. https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware is a common reference implementation that supports a bunch of platforms, but many others (e.g. all Samsung and Qualcomm phones) also use their own proprietary stuff which is not publicly available.

Come again? https://github.com/ARM-software/arm-trusted-firmware

Not really, here it is winning hands down over Swift's ARC implementation.

https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages

You laugh, but ... https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages

GC'd languages are designed to leverage GCs, meaning they usually allocate a lot. Some of the more recent ones (C#, Go) have ways around it or to limit it, but in your average GC'd language you have to really bend yourself out of shape to limit allocations (IIRC the Ixy effort / study / thing never managed to make the Java hotpath allocation-free).

It's kind of funny when you see things like this project: https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages

like not-even-in-the-same-ballpark faster. In this realworld example (userspace network drivers in managed languages) JS manages about 20-30% of native code performance, python iirc is below 1%

- Support for generic-aware value types (struct vs. class) and low-level features like stackalloc: very valuable for high-performance scenarios and native FFI. See for instance https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages. In comparison, Java doesn't even have unsigned integers. Yes, Project Valhalla is coming someday.

As well, debatable to some folks, but: properties (get/set); operator overloading; LINQ > Java streams; extension methods; default parameters; collection initializers; tuples; nullable reference types; a dozen smaller features

Very bottom of this file https://github.com/ixy-languages/ixy-languages/blob/master/Java-garbage-collectors.md