argdown VS WBO

```

You'd then be able to interleave prose and graph structures in a single file rather than dealing with two separate parsing structures. Even better, the end result would still be Markdown compliant.

[0]: https://argdown.org/

Having a diagram helped me multiple times. I'm aware of different types and I'm quite interested in visualisation, but... it never really mattered. A diagram showing what you want is good, others are not, regardless of whether it has an official name.

One specific non-SW type I consciously use is an argument map, if you're after decision making. See argdown https://argdown.org/

Does someone know about https://argdown.org/ syntax and has some ideas on how it could be related (implemented) to Obsidian Canvas?

As a maintainer of an open source JavaScript infinite canvas application [1], I was very interested, and now I am a little disappointed. The set of supported objects on the canvas is quite minimal.

[1] https://github.com/lovasoa/whitebophir

Could a self-hosted whiteboard work? * Excalidraw allows images to be inserted * WBO has a built-in grid mode (but no ruler)

You can share and use a Scrumblr only with the link. But no possibility to import other than opening the same board again (and exporting, printing the page as PDF). Same with the whiteboard WBO, but much more complete and polished one (and has SSL).

Aside from kanban boards, a virtual whiteboard might also work well: * Excalidraw (live) * WBO (live)

A whiteboard thing? Like WBO or Spacedeck

Fluffyboard and WBO - I prefer Fluffyboard because it has an Android app.

This one seems to work well: https://wbo.ophir.dev/

It's basically this: https://wbo.ophir.dev/