apollo-studio-community VS GraphQL for .NET

HINT: Writing the query or mutation syntax can be time-consuming because you have to ensure everything is correct. But no worries, GraphQL is introspective, use this website to see and write your queries and mutations: https://studio.apollographql.com/, just put your GraphQL API and it will show you everything on that API.

I once had to authenticate requests made from Apollo Studio to my local development server. The locally running GraphQL API was using session cookies for authentication. While there were workarounds and configs in order to set cookies correctly for requests sent from Apollo Studio, I wasn't able to reliably make it work. Also, I didn't want to change the cookie configs in my server as it would mess with my frontend setup.

But it seems like in Apollo studio (https://studio.apollographql.com/) and Apollo servers in general, ask for an API link, not a database link.

access-control-allow-origin: https://studio.apollographql.com

Run the service with node index.js command. Navigate to http://localhost:4000/ in your browser. It will open up Apollo Studio.

import express from "express"; import cors from 'cors' import { ApolloServer } from 'apollo-server-express'; import mongoose from 'mongoose'; import { resolvers } from './resolvers/TestResolver'; import { typeDefs } from './typeDefs/typedefs'; const PORT=4000; const startServer=async()=> { const app = express(); const allowedOrigins = [ 'http://localhost:3000', 'http://localhost:3001', 'https://studio.apollographql.com' ]; const corsOptions = { credentials: true, origin: function(origin, callback){ if(!origin) return callback(null, true); if(allowedOrigins.indexOf(origin) === -1){ var msg = 'The CORS policy for this site does not ' + 'allow access from the specified Origin.'; return callback(new Error(msg), false); } return callback(null, true); } } app.use(cors(corsOptions)) var uri = "mongodb://localhost:27017/testmongo"; //@ts-ignore mongoose.connect(uri, { useUnifiedTopology: true, useNewUrlParser: true }) .then(()=>console.log("connected to newmango db")) //rest routes app.get("/", (req, res) => { res.json({ data: "API is working...", }); }); const server = new ApolloServer({ typeDefs, resolvers, }); await server.start(); server.applyMiddleware({ app }); app.listen(PORT, () => { console.log(` Server is running at http://localhost:${PORT}`); }); } startServer().catch(e=>console.log("error strting server======== ",e))

IDEs are test tools to check the correctness of your queries. You can define your queries in the IDE and then send them to the server. The server will return the data that is requested if the query is correct. There are a lot of IDEs available. The most popular and the simplest IDE for GraphQL queries is GraphiQL. The modern clone of GraphiQL is GraphQL Playground. The environment is cleaner and has some advanced features. The recent IDE for GraphQL queries is Apollo Explorer. All-around tools such as Postman and Insomnia are great tools for testing either GraphQL queries or RESTful APIs.

apolloServer.applyMiddleware({ app, cors: false, // cors: { // credentials: true, // // origin: "https://studio.apollographql.com", // origin: "http://localhost:3000", // }, });

Apollo Studio — Apollo Studio is a cloud platform that helps you create, validate, and secure your organization's org chart.

What is the difference or advantage to public graphql api (except rest vs graphQl): https://studio.apollographql.com/ of defichain-income?

The way that’s done in Visualizer is quite specific to my needs and to the library that I’m using, called GraphQl-Dotnet.

I'm starting a brand new project. Looks like if we want to do GraphQL in .NET, it's either graphql-dotnet or Hot Chocolate. Both look pretty good on paper.

This is a template API using Clean Architecture alongside a .net implementation of GraphQL.

Customising the default ParallelExecutionStrategy is harder though. The best way to achieve this is to take the existing source code and modify it. The key section we need to modify is the last part of the try/catch in ExecuteNodeTreeAsync:

Because it can depend on the context. I know the PHP Laravel integration for GraphQL I used was leveraging the Carbon interface instead of PHP's native Date type. In NestJS the integrated solution allows you to choose whether to use UNIX timestamps or ISO datetimes. TypeGraphQL does something similar if I'm not wrong, and the .NET library added a bunch of date-related scalars in a PR they made for v2.

If you're loving your current stack, you should stick with it :) But, if you're experiencing some of the problems described in the article, you might want to try Apollo. It's incrementally adoptable, so you don't have to rewrite your whole app to start using it. There's also a community maintained .NET implementation of GraphQL, so you could use that for your graph and use Apollo Client to connect it to the frontend.