apollo-android VS graphql-spec

GraphQL queries are just HTTP POST queries with a JSON body. They're supported everywhere.

If you want specialized tooling for them, Kotlin and Swift both have great strongly-typed GraphQL libraries.

Apollo publishes libraries for both:

- https://www.apollographql.com/docs/kotlin/

- https://www.apollographql.com/docs/ios/

An example of a Snowflake API request using Java. This example uses Java’s built-in HttpClient and constructs JSON manually, so it doesn’t require additional dependencies; however, in production, you should use a library like Jackson for constructing JSON. Additionally, for stronger typing, you could use Apollo’s Kotlin-based GraphQL client.

Can you elaborate on what you are trying to do? Why do you generate those classes manually? If you are using Apollo Kotlin then it will generate your data classes based on your query.

We continue to rely on Apollo Kotlin (previously Apollo Android) as we migrate to Federation. It has evolved quite a bit since its creation and has been hugely useful to us, so it’s worth highlighting before jumping ahead.

- found Flutter graphql is way ahead , even almost mature as Apollo for JS. apollo-kotlin is several miles behind, a lot of issues, absolutely inconvenient usage after graphql-flutter

The announcement is at https://www.apollographql.com/blog/announcement/introducing-apollo-kotlin/ and the repo at https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-kotlin. Try it out and let us know what you think!

Apollo Client does have a good integration with these frameworks including React, iOS and Android — so, you might want to check that out

Hi 👋Martin from https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android here. Can you ellaborate more on "created schema files are not serialized" ? For Android app, I usually recommend separating the persistence layer and the network models so that they're not coupled. But maybe it's different from a microservice?

GraphQL's first draft release was 8 years ago. [1]

It's first non-draft release was 5 years ago. [2]

It's first release under a community foundation was 2 years ago. [3]

[1] https://spec.graphql.org/July2015/

[2] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/releases/tag/June201...

[3] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/releases/tag/October...

I'm a big believer in GraphQL (in fact, at time of writing I'm #2 contributor to the GraphQL spec itself) so it pains me that a tool I built doesn't always have easy ways to achieve the "versionless schema" design that GraphQL encourages when it comes to making significant breaking changes to your underlying database tables. (Personally, I think you should aim for your database schema itself to be versionless, but this is not always possible.) Of course you can build your PostGraphile schema over views instead of tables, but views have their own problems that I won't go into here…

I created a proposal for Map type but didn’t make it through.

https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/pull/888

The issue with GraphQL is it tries to appease too many masters.

Similar to jsx. The language isn’t evolving.

The good thing is the spec is (almost) frozen, so there’s many implementations, the bad is it can encompass the flexibility of json schema can do.

Longer thread - Subscriptions RFC: Are Subscriptions and Live Queries the same thing?

https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/284

You’ve probably figured it out by now, but for others who may be in a similar position; GraphQL is a specification (with various implementations) and you can read up on the spec here: https://spec.graphql.org/

If you're asking whether GraphQL supports anonymous objects that can be arbitrarily nested then no, it doesn't.

show this feature request some love https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/174

* Performance: It's just hard to track down what makes an operation slow. The waterfall nature of resolvers is a big contributor

[1] https://github.com/graphql/graphql-spec/issues/488

:::note GraphQL Union is available for Types only, not for Inputs. However, the oneOf directive will bridge the gap in the future.