anytype-ts VS anytype-kotlin

WIth every architectural choice we aim to make fundamental digital freedoms unconditional. Here you can read more about why - cloud vs. local first Internet [2].

[1] https://anytype.io/

It's not FOSS, it's source-available[1].

[1] https://github.com/anyproto/anytype-ts/blob/main/LICENSE.md

Tried Zettlr a week ago, same result.

Somehow I seem nobody noticed anytype - https://anytype.io/

Have you checked out Anytype[0]. Was recently posted/discussed here on HN a few days ago[1].

No affiliation, just interesting project that aligns with your description.

[0]: https://anytype.io/

Another Obsidian alternative which I use every day is Anytype[1]. It's fully open source however under their own license which has some interesting terms to discourage commercial adoption. They seem to be very focused on individual use. The user experience is similar to Notion with some subtle differences, but overall very positive. The biggest plus for me was offline p2p sync and a really solid mobile app.

[1] https://anytype.io/

+1 and curious, too

I would go further than that also. It directly mirrors https://anytype.io/ but without the desktop or mobile clients to actually store the workspace on your device.

Anytype and Apple Note are working great together

Anytype (Similar to Notion but Private and Encrypted)

Can look at Anytype (https://anytype.io/) if you want software installed on ur system - sort of an alternative to Notion, just not as feature rich.

GNU also misses the point a bit. With open source, the source is open, but some other general rights are included too, like to restriction to the type usage. Lately, people and corporations made a lot of money on the backs of open source developers, so a new type of license emerged, and this would be the one that really is just about the "open" "source", but to make it distinct from the already widely known term, people call these "source available". Getting back to the topic, Any knows these distinctions too - or at least their lawyer did, because they call their license a "Source Available License"[0]. Source-available however doesn't carry the coolness of what "open source" brings - so on the marketing page, they refer to the project as "open source", which kind of can be argued, since the majority of it is indeed proper open source.

[0] https://github.com/anyproto/anytype-kotlin/blob/main/LICENSE...