ansible-easy-vpn VS Filestash

I would put this behind a VPN to keep it private. I have used this[0] Wireguard setup before, which takes the grunt work out of configuring everything.

[0] https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn

This Wireguard VPN "package": here

https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn can help with the configuration.

Use this script to deploy Wireguard VPN server. https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMF301vQqJo

I use Wireguard. Here is a nice tutorial with the Ansible playbook. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMF301vQqJo https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn

I have been using Jellyfin for a while now, but recently changed my setup a little. My server is now behind a VPN created with this script: https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn. I used to have port forwarding setup with my previous VPN provider, and then used nginx on the same server that Jellyfin was running on for a reverse proxy. This allowed me to access my server outside my home, but also use a VPN. Now (assuming the client device isn't connected to the same VPN) I can't do that. It seems that if I edit the BunkerWeb .env file I should be able to get a similar setup, but I can't figure out how. The Jellyfin documentation only discusses nginx and not what I'm using.

Server (VPS with this guide: https://github.com/notthebee/ansible-easy-vpn):

I have used this setup and initially the speed was nearly full bandwidth, but not anymore.

Filestash — A Dropbox-like file manager that connects to a range of protocols and platforms: S3, FTP, SFTP, Minio, Git, WebDAV, Backblaze, LDAP and more.

I made https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash out of the need to collaborate on org mode documents with non emacs users. Once the first release was done, I got to reflect on the infamous top comment of the Dropbox HN to make an attempt at abstracting the storage aspect of Dropbox so those org document could be made stored on a FTP server, SFTP, S3, ....

> we need an abstraction for just this. "Bring your own storage"

I made exactly this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash and there's an API from which you can abstract any kind of storage: S3, SFTP, FTP, GIT, WebDav, Samba, Local FS, NFS, Backblaze, Storj, Artifactory, .... There's even some funky ones like Mysql from which you have an abstraction where first level folders are databases, second level folders are tables and files are the actual rows

Yes, I rewrote my react app onto vanilla JS using nothing else than rxjs, didn't have the time to document it all yet but it looks like this: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/blob/master/pub...

I'm not familiar with Cloudreve, but FileStash is a similar application often recommended on this subreddit.

I do use them on my OSS work (https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/tree/master/pub...) which is used by many thousands of people

- [2] current state of the rewrite where you can see this pattern in action https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash-rewrite/tree/ma...

https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash

This is what I wish Dropbox was, a simple layer that make interacting with your FTP server easy so nobody has to own your data. The end game is both to be feature complete with Dropbox and be able to change every aspect of the application through plugin so everyone can get out what they want from it.

> but I don't think its the companies responsibility to give back to open source just because they use it

As someone who does quite a bit of OSS, the reality is most people are asking for things but aren't willing to pay for it. Take Microsoft, I had one of their employee asking me to support their azure stuff: https://github.com/mickael-kerjean/filestash/issues/180. When I found out the dude was actually employed by Microsoft, he started to talk some nonsense and ended up running away.