amphtml VS TextSecure

https://amp.dev/ is that. No one wants to use it because the very first line of the mandatory js file is about advertising metrics.

Google announced an open source HTML framework called AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) for better and faster experiences on the mobile web (Google said that) in 2015. This was created in an effort to play against Facebook Instant Articles.

Does Flutter web allow for AMP compatibility?

Without disclosing too much, I am fairly involved around this topic, and I would say it's definitely heading for deprecation this year. The key giveaway is that Google Analytics 3 will be shutting down in July[0] and AMP has made no progress towards supporting Google Analytics 4[1]. I think it'll be deprecated at first rather than shut down because there are still billions of AMP documents floating around the web.

[0] https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/11583528?hl=en

[1] https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/24621

Accelerated Mobile Page is a Google-backed open-source project that allows you to create fast-loading super mobile-friendly pages.

OK, so we've all probably heard about AMP HTML from Google by now.

No JavaScript will be allowed other than an off-the-shelf AMP library

Recently I came across the AMP website at https://amp.dev/ (after some years since first seeing it). It’s really remarkable how much Google wants to pretend this is an industry standard and not their own little fiefdom. I don’t see the word Google anywhere, not even on the About page.

More about AMP

Moxie's reasons for disallowing Signal distribution via F-droid always rang a little flat to me ( https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/127 ). Lots of chatter about the supposedly superior security model of Google Play Store, and as a result fewer eyes independently building and testing the Signal code base. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but independent and reproducible builds seem like a net positive for everyone. Always struggled to understand releasing code as open source without taking advantage of the community's willingness to build and test. Looking at it in a new light after the XZ backdoor, and Jia Tan's interactions with other FOSS folk.

Signal has documentation on how to reproduce their Play Store builds and compare them with what you've installed locally:

https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/reprod...

There's nothing on Signal blog as of yet, but Signal's git repository was tagged with v7.0.0 yesterday and we can see from the commit history since the previously tagged version (v6.74.4) that there will be a setting to hide one's phone number [1], as well as disabling the previous default behavior of advertising that one is on Signal to all their contacts already using it [2].

[1] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/8797236b5... (PNP stands for "Phone Number Privacy")

[2] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/6097e6c30...

Signal works the same but without the user tracking from Meta/Facebook. Many people use it as well but I'm surprised that a majority sticks to WhatsApp.

Telegram and Signal solve this.

Sadly yes: Looks like an open issue 13290 for Signal, sounds like they were/are indeed still interacting through google's push notification service, wat, and per a link at that issue it was a chore for Tutanota to break away once they realised it was a problem some years ago (though at least they thought about it years ago? wtf Signal...)

Here is one: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/tree/main/reprod...

Rule 1: Posts to r/signal must relate to Signal.