alameda
webpack-common-shake
alameda | webpack-common-shake | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
193 | 914 | |
0.0% | - | |
10.0 | 0.0 | |
over 4 years ago | about 1 year ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
alameda
-
CommonJS Is Hurting JavaScript
FWIW they did it[0]. Alameda is promise based AMD
[0]: https://github.com/requirejs/alameda
webpack-common-shake
-
CommonJS Is Hurting JavaScript
While I agree the dynamic nature of CommonJS would be problematic, there were successful projects around treeshaking commonjs[0] that worked really well.
I think dynamic imports have some of the same footguns here, to be honest. Can't deny ESM is easier to statically analyze though, that much appears to be true across the board based on available evidence.
[0]: https://github.com/indutny/webpack-common-shake
-
[AskJS] What are still present issues in contemporary (2022) JavaScript?
Tree shaking in CommonJS is possible: here's a Webpack CommonJS Tree Shaking package.
What are some alternatives?
esm - Tomorrow's ECMAScript modules today!
proposal-upsert - ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Map.prototype.upsert
meta - Meta discussions and unicorns. Not necessarily in that order.
loader - A universal async JS loader.
proposal-do-expressions - Proposal for `do` expressions
node-fetch - A light-weight module that brings the Fetch API to Node.js
node - Node.js JavaScript runtime ✨🐢🚀✨
wtfjs - 🤪 A list of funny and tricky JavaScript examples
proposal-record-tuple - ECMAScript proposal for the Record and Tuple value types. | Stage 2: it will change!