alameda VS loader

Compare alameda vs loader and see what are their differences.

alameda

AMD loader, like requirejs, but with promises and for modern browsers (by requirejs)

loader

A universal async JS loader. (by mqudsi)
SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
With SurveyJS form UI libraries, you can build and style forms in a fully-integrated drag & drop form builder, render them in your JS app, and store form submission data in any backend, inc. PHP, ASP.NET Core, and Node.js.
surveyjs.io
featured
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
alameda loader
1 1
193 0
0.0% -
10.0 7.9
over 4 years ago 9 months ago
JavaScript TypeScript
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

alameda

Posts with mentions or reviews of alameda. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-30.

loader

Posts with mentions or reviews of loader. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-30.
  • CommonJS Is Hurting JavaScript
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Jun 2023
    Your first point is absolutely spot-on but I am curious as to how much treeshaking was on the minds of masses at the time. The tooling of that era didn't really have any good support for tree shaking even for non-AMD includes and it was quite experimental tech (as in, I don't think it was a decision making factor for the majority of the tools on the scene).

    The second point actually isn't strictly valid. I've written my own "all-in-one" async custom loader [0] that can require() CommonJS/AMD includes or regular "add a script tag" includes w/out any exports, all asynchronously, with asynchronous dependency trees for each async dependency in turn. You can define in the HTML source code a "source map" that maps each dependency name to a specific URL, so that you don't need knowledge of the filesystem tree to load dependencies.

    Ideally, this source map can be generated via the tooling you use to compile the code (e.g. `tsc` is aware of the path to each dependency) but I haven't written my own tool to generate the require path to url map.

    [0]: https://github.com/mqudsi/loader

What are some alternatives?

When comparing alameda and loader you can also consider the following projects:

esm - Tomorrow's ECMAScript modules today!

webpack-common-shake - CommonJS Tree Shaker plugin for WebPack

meta - Meta discussions and unicorns. Not necessarily in that order.