Akka.net
language-ext
Our great sponsors
Akka.net | language-ext | |
---|---|---|
20 | 41 | |
4,612 | 6,159 | |
0.8% | - | |
9.3 | 6.9 | |
5 days ago | 4 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Akka.net
-
What is the fastest producer consumer model in C#
akka.net actors. Actors all the way! https://getakka.net
- .NET - iskustva s akka.net?
-
MassTransit with MSMQ vs RabbitMQ
If it's the former you may want to take a look at something like the actor model akka.net with persistent actors (https://getakka.net/articles/persistence/architecture.html). No need of an external message broker or mass transit (which is a wrapper over different message brokers). You could use sqllite for persisting the actors state to recover in case of a restart.
-
For .NET 6+, is there value in using NHibernate with Sprint.net or should I stick with EF Core and the usual supporting libraries?
Spring and Hibernate are the goto libraries in Java land and I suspect that's the primary motivation for your colleague's recommendations. It's quite easy to bulldoze someone less experienced with your ideas so be careful of that. I'd avoid both. They aren't bad libraries at all but they have a 'legacy' feel and it will make your application less future proof. Would a distributed system be viable? If so then I'd recommend Akka, there'a .NET port of it that's well supported and maintained.
-
Learning resource for seniors
Is akka a good alternative?
- Carl Hewitt has died [pdf]
-
Using functional extensions in production C# code?
However, I've found that sometimes, they are a little -too- functional. I'm a bit more preferential to Akka.Net's implementation of Option and Try, if only because they have good 'escape hatches' where you interrogate them in a more procedural manner.
-
Microsoft RulesEngine. Feedback from those that have used it in enterprise environments
This project is also what ultimately led to the creation of Akka.NET - I wrote an overview on how our application was built here: https://aaronstannard.com/markedup-akkadotnet/
-
Questions about network programming with C#
You may also want to take a look at queues (e.g. RabbitMQ) or even something like Akka.NET or Microsoft Orleans.
-
What does the .NET ecosystem offer in terms of distributed data processing frameworks?
From the title I immediately thought AKKA.NET or Orleans
language-ext
-
The Monad Invasion - Part 2: Monads in Action!
You probably noticed that .SetName() returns a Either. You may have come across Unit in libraries like MediatR or Language-Ext. It's a simple construct representing a type with only one possible value. We use it as a placeholder for operations that do not return a value but may return another state. In our example, .SetName() is a Command that does not return a value but may fail. Therefore, the monad Either carries two possible states: Right (without value) or Left (with an Error).
-
The Monad Invasion - Part 1: What's a Monad?
Language-Ext is my personal favourite, but it can be a bit overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive feature set
- Why don't you just use F#?
-
The combined power of F# and C#
> but I just want something closer to Scala, but for .Net
That's what I'm working toward with my language-ext library [1]. Obviously more support for expression based programming would be welcome (and higher kinds), but you can do a lot with LINQ and a good integrated library surface.
[1] https://github.com/louthy/language-ext
-
Option<T> monad for Unity/UniTask
Definitely a fan of option types, I wonder this library has anything over the C# library language-ext which also has an Option type?
-
Result pattern: language-ext vs FunctionalExtensions?
Hey, I am considering adopting the Result pattern in my codebase. Wanted to get some opinions from someone who has experience with it: should I start with language-ext or FunctionalExtensions?
-
John Carmack on Functional Programming in C++ (2018)
> [1] https://github.com/louthy/language-ext
Cool library. I've had a few of these patterns in my Sasa library for years, but you've taken it to the Haskell extreme! Probably further than most C# developers could stomach. ;-)
You might be interested in checking out the hash array mapped trie from Sasa [1]. It cleverly exploits the CLR's reified generics to unbox the trie at various levels which ends up saving quite a bit of space and indirections, so it performs almost on par with the mutable dictionary.
I had an earlier version that used an outer struct to ensure it's never null, similar to how your collections seem to work, but switched to classes to make it more idiomatic in C#.
I recently started sketching out a Haskell-like generic "Deriving" source generator, contrasted with your domain-specific piecemeal approach, ie. [Record], [Reader], etc. Did you ever try that approach?
[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/sasa/code/ci/default/tree/Sasa.Col...
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/sasa/code/ci/57417faec5ed442224a0f...
-
Don't sleep on Linq query syntax if you regularly iterate through large/complex data sources
languageext supports linq for its monads and I kinda love it. The challenge is convincing my colleagues. 😅
-
What C# feature blew your mind when you learned it?
language-ext supports it and it's pretty dang cool.
-
It's actually not that bad...
I can only recommend c# language extensions library https://github.com/louthy/language-ext
What are some alternatives?
protoactor-dotnet - Proto Actor - Ultra fast distributed actors for Go, C# and Java/Kotlin
OneOf - Easy to use F#-like ~discriminated~ unions for C# with exhaustive compile time matching
Orleankka - Functional API for Microsoft Orleans http://orleanscontrib.github.io/Orleankka
CSharpFunctionalExtensions - Functional extensions for C#
Orleans - Cloud Native application framework for .NET
Optional - A robust option type for C#
.NET port of LMAX Disruptor - Port of LMAX Disruptor to .NET
MoreLINQ - Extensions to LINQ to Objects
.NEXT Raft
Curryfy - Provides strongly typed extensions methods for C# delegates to take advantages of functional programming techniques, like currying and partial application.
MBrace - MBrace Core Libraries & Runtime Foundations
VisualFSharp - The F# compiler, F# core library, F# language service, and F# tooling integration for Visual Studio