spot VS trpc-openapi

That's obviously not a great situation, so I've started experimenting with airtasker/spot which uses a Typescript-based DSL to generate OpenAPI specs. It's a decent stopgap, although I would love it if we could adapt something like this to Rust using doc-comments and attributes or something so the documentation can live in the code itself.

https://github.com/grantila/typeconv/ https://github.com/airtasker/spot https://github.com/vega/ts-json-schema-generator

tRPC does not natively export OpenAPI documents, but the trpc-openapi package adds this functionality. We'll start this tutorial by adding trpc-openapi to a project, and then we'll add a script to generate an OpenAPI schema and save it as a file.

While trpc-openapi originally was used to expose REST endpoints of the tRPC router, we will use it to generate an OpenAPI specification for our API.

Sure it can, you can use https://github.com/prosepilot/trpc-openapi

You either have to go with react native or use https://github.com/jlalmes/trpc-openapi to generate rest endpoint using trpc. lol. Not sure how good the trpc-openapi package is though. Read somewhere it was missing stuff

As for exposing the API externally, neither (can) limit this but SvelteKit's API is generally considered to be an internal implementation detail that you don't use directly since it might change between versions. If you want to expose an API you should choose tRPC, probably alongside the OpenAPI plugin or something similar.

In essence, features of the language made for static type checking at compilation are possibly being left favour of tools that act like a superset of the language that provide the static build type checking and offer runtime type checking too. An example I recently saw was the trpc-openapi package which uses Zod for creating the types of the schema for the http request and responses, it takes a zod schema as that is what it can use when compiled to JavaScript to generate the types for the openapi file at runtime, there's scarcely a type or interface in sight when using it but you have full type safety.

Take a look at https://github.com/jlalmes/trpc-openapi which will give you a rest endpoint based on your trpc router. Ymmv in reality but basically this should give you some confidence that your trpc router can be called from another client (not just next).

Ok thanks, I did find a good example here https://github.com/jlalmes/trpc-openapi/blob/master/examples/with-nextjs/src/server/router.ts

There is an OpenAPI Extension for tRPC that can be used to create a more REST-like API from your procedures, and that in turn can be used for auto-generating documentation. But if my app needed to offer third-party API access, I would likely reach for GraphQL again.

tRPC is nice because you have type safety the whole way down. Someone has made a tRPC OpenaAPI for exposing tRPC procedures externally in the OpenAPI format https://github.com/jlalmes/trpc-openapi