Cockpit
Grav
Cockpit | Grav | |
---|---|---|
19 | 84 | |
5,377 | 14,290 | |
-0.0% | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 8.5 | |
6 days ago | 10 days ago | |
JavaScript | PHP | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Cockpit
-
How "static" are the Azure storage websites and can a basic CMS be used with it?
Hmm...I just tried https://getcockpit.com/, which looks like a super lightweight CMS and PHP doesn't seem to work.
-
SPF Fail on Contact Form Entries (PHPMailer)
I am struggling with my instance of cockpit Cockpit (getcockpit.com) that all contact forms on my website keeps going to spam. The SPF record is correct.
-
Pocketbase alternative made with php
https://getcockpit.com/ Recommend using V1, since V2 is a bit new and lags documentation and plugins.
- Which headless cms to use for small project?
-
Looking for a stupid simple CMS solution for static pages!
Might be a long shot, and I haven't checked in on the project in years, but maybe cockpit https://getcockpit.com/ ?
-
Yes, SvelteKit for the frontend (win)! But what about a CMS dashboard for clients?
Cockpit
- Here in 2022, what's the best headless CMS on PHP?
-
The Best 10+ Open Source Headless CMS 2022
Cockpit CMS is a straightforward framework for managing complicated and organized information. Additionally, it makes it possible to control the content adaptably and with few limits. This Open Source Headless CMS also supports a variety of devices on a single platform. It is very simple to install, and it takes little time to finish. As a result, you can begin your job without any problem or difficulty.
-
Ask HN: Any Recommendations for a Headless CMS?
I've been using Cockpit (https://getcockpit.com/) for a few internal and personal projects now.
It's lightweight and easy to use. Just upload the folder to your webspace (minimal PHP requirements!) and you are good to go.
Create some collections for you data, link them if needed, and you can immediately use them via the API endpoints AND also via a GUI for CRUD operations.
This is really great because my colleagues are non-technical and I don't need to write some frontend for them to update data and so on and can concentrate on the "real task".
Documentation on the other hand is awful, to the point where you better refer to the "inofficial documentation" (for the interested: https://zeraton.gitlab.io/cockpit-docs/) with no way to improve the official one.
So, while I LOVE the ease of use, I wondered if somebody has a recommendation for a similar solution which might be somewhat more "mature" in regards to the documentation.
-
15 JavaScript GitHub Repos You Should Check Out
Link
Grav
-
Ask HN: What products other than Obsidian share the file over app philosophy?
There are flat-file CMSes (content management systems) like Grav: https://getgrav.org/
I guess, in some vague/broad sense, config-as-code systems also implement something similar? Maybe even OpenAPI schemas could count to some degree...?
In the old days, the "semantic web" movement was an attempt to make more webpages both human- and machine-readable indefinitely by tagging them with proper schema: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework. Even Google was on board for a while, but I guess it never saw much uptake. As far as I can tell it's basically dead now, both because of non-semantic HTML (everything as a React div), general laziness, and LLMs being able to parse things loosely.
-------------
Side thoughts...
Philosophically, I don't know that capturing raw data alone as files is really sufficient to capture the nuances of any particular experience, or the overall zeitgeist of an era. You can archive Geocities pages, but that doesn't really capture the novelty and indie-ness of that era. Similarly, you can save TikTok videos, but absent the cultural environment that created them (and a faithful recreation of the recommendation algorithm), they wouldn't really show future archaeologists how teenagers today lived.
I worked for a natural history museum for a while, and while we were there, one of the interesting questions (well, to me anyway) was whether our web content was in and of itself worth preserving as a cultural artifact -- both so that future generations can see what exhibits were interesting/apropos for the cultures of our times, but also so they could see how our generation found out about those exhibitions to begin with (who knows what the Web will morph into 50 years later). It wasn't enough to simply save the HTML of our web pages, both because they tie into various other APIs and databases (like zoological collections) and because some were interactive experiences, like games designed to be played with a mouse (before phones were popular), or phone chatbots with some of our specimens. To really capture the experience authentically would've required emulating not just our tech stacks and devices, among other things.
Like for the earlier Geocities example, sure you could just save the old HTML and render it with a modern browser, but that's not the same as something like https://oldweb.today/?browser=ns3-mac#http://geocities.com/ , which emulates the whole OS and browser too. And that still isn't the same as having to sit in front of a tiny CRT and wait minutes for everything to download over a 14.4k modem, only to be interrupted when mom had to make a call.
I guess that's a longwinded of critiquing "file over app": It only makes sense for things that are originally files/documents to begin with. Much of our lives now are not flat docs but "experiences" that take much more thought and effort to archive. If the goal is truly to preserve that posterity, it's not enough to just archive their raw data, but to develop ways to record and later emulate entire experiences, both technological and cultural. It ain't easy!
- Soupault: A static website management tool
- Grav is a modern open-source flat-file CMS
- Grav β A Modern Flat-File CMS Using PHP and Markdown
-
It Took Me a Decade to Find the Perfect Personal Website Stack β Ghost+Fathom
I took a more traditional approach, focusing on something that's "good enough", which in my case was a cheap VPS and an install of Grav: https://getgrav.org/
Some optional customization for page templates/fonts/CSS, some CI so I can build and deploy it inside of a Docker container, Matomo for analytics that respect privacy (which I already use elsewhere) and some additional web server configuration to hide anything interesting behind an additional login and I'm good. Maybe backups and uptime monitoring if I'm feeling brave, which is what most sites should also have (so copy + paste there).
All of that for under 100 euros per year (could also pay half of that if I didn't host anything else on the server), the blog has actually survived getting on the front page of HN once or twice and requires relatively little maintenance, at least a bit less than a proper install of WordPress, due to its larger surface area.
The best thing is that it's simple enough for me to understand how it works, to be able to move it anywhere as needed and use more or less plain Markdown for writing the blog posts. Here's a quick example of a recent post: https://blog.kronis.dev/articles/ever-wanted-to-read-thousan...
Now all that's left is to find motivation to write more, but at least 90% of my time doesn't go into tinkering with custom fancy solutions, no matter how much I'd love that. Then again, nothing wrong with the alternatives either: 400 euros might be perfectly worth it for some, whereas working with static site generators or even custom CMSes would be a fun experience for others!
- Grav: Modern, open-source, flat-file CMS
-
Is it possible to convert a WordPress site into a static site that can still be easily edited?
I'd check out Grav. https://getgrav.org/
-
Gravity - A new, open source DNS/DHCP server with Adblocking and inbuilt config replication
Also, there is a CMS called Grav. Both Gravity and Grav use a very similar (but not identical) font for their logo.
- Mercredi Tech - 2023-06-28
-
website with unlimited pages ??
I would use a flat file cms like https://getgrav.org
What are some alternatives?
Strapi - π Strapi is the leading open-source headless CMS. Itβs 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, fully customizable and developer-first.
Pico - Pico is a stupidly simple, blazing fast, flat file CMS.
Directus - The Modern Data Stack π° β Directus is an instant REST+GraphQL API and intuitive no-code data collaboration app for any SQL database.
october - Self-hosted CMS platform based on the Laravel PHP Framework.
django-cms - The easy-to-use and developer-friendly enterprise CMS powered by Django
Bolt - Bolt is a simple CMS written in PHP. It is based on Silex and Symfony components, uses Twig and either SQLite, MySQL or PostgreSQL.
ApostropheCMS - A full-featured, open-source content management framework built with Node.js that empowers organizations by combining in-context editing and headless architecture in a full-stack JS environment.
Bludit - Simple, Fast, Secure, Flat-File CMS
CRUD - Build custom admin panels. Fast!
cockpit-samba-manager - A Cockpit plugin to manage Samba shares and users.
GetSimple CMS - GetSimple CMS