TextSecure
activitypub | TextSecure | |
---|---|---|
4 | 986 | |
1,142 | 24,950 | |
2.1% | 0.6% | |
7.3 | 9.9 | |
2 months ago | 7 days ago | |
HTML | Java | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
activitypub
- Why just blocking Meta's Threads won't be enough
-
EU warns Musk that Twitter faces ban over content moderation -FT
At the moment, if you private message a user on another website, those messages can be seen by the other website's admins. Just like if I (a Gmail user) emailed a Yahoo user, Yahoo would be able to read those emails -- you run into the same problem you've described. It looks like this was brought up a few years ago on an ActivityPub issue.
-
Comparison to BlueSky / AT protocol / Matrix?
I presume this is it https://github.com/w3c/activitypub
-
Mastodon Explained
Calling it dystopian is a bit harsh. Some degree of moderation is unavoidable or you end up with 4chan (actually, even 4chan had moderation, I think; it's just unavoidable).
Ultimately of course you're supposed to choose a server that you like and trust. At least here you have that choice. On Twitter or Facebook you don't.
Of course it should have had end to end encryption. It sounds like a massive omission. I found a discussion about adding that to ActivityPub[0] where someone points out that if you don't want server admins able to read messages, you can't store private keys on the server, which sounds to me like it would hurt usability. Makes you wonder how unbreakable the end-to-end encryption of other systems really is. I'm not enough of an encryption guru to say how big of a problem this really is.
[0] https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/225
TextSecure
-
The xz sshd backdoor rabbithole goes quite a bit deeper
Moxie's reasons for disallowing Signal distribution via F-droid always rang a little flat to me ( https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/issues/127 ). Lots of chatter about the supposedly superior security model of Google Play Store, and as a result fewer eyes independently building and testing the Signal code base. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but independent and reproducible builds seem like a net positive for everyone. Always struggled to understand releasing code as open source without taking advantage of the community's willingness to build and test. Looking at it in a new light after the XZ backdoor, and Jia Tan's interactions with other FOSS folk.
- WhatsApp forces Pegasus spyware maker to share its secret code
-
Signal: Keep your phone number private with Signal usernames
Signal has documentation on how to reproduce their Play Store builds and compare them with what you've installed locally:
https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/blob/main/reprod...
-
Signal v7.0.0 with phone number privacy
There's nothing on Signal blog as of yet, but Signal's git repository was tagged with v7.0.0 yesterday and we can see from the commit history since the previously tagged version (v6.74.4) that there will be a setting to hide one's phone number [1], as well as disabling the previous default behavior of advertising that one is on Signal to all their contacts already using it [2].
[1] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/8797236b5... (PNP stands for "Phone Number Privacy")
[2] https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/commit/6097e6c30...
-
What are you shocked people are still doing nowadays?
Signal works the same but without the user tracking from Meta/Facebook. Many people use it as well but I'm surprised that a majority sticks to WhatsApp.
-
Apple has seemingly found a way to block Android’s new iMessage app
Telegram and Signal solve this.
-
Apple Just Confirmed Governments Are Spying on People’s Phones With Push Notifications
Sadly yes: Looks like an open issue 13290 for Signal, sounds like they were/are indeed still interacting through google's push notification service, wat, and per a link at that issue it was a chore for Tutanota to break away once they realised it was a problem some years ago (though at least they thought about it years ago? wtf Signal...)
-
Building end-to-end security for Messenger – Engineering at Meta
Here is one: https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android/tree/main/reprod...
- Are Signal Notifications Encrypted ?
-
Facebook & Messenger finally get end-to-end encryption
Rule 1: Posts to r/signal must relate to Signal.
What are some alternatives?
Platform - Qbix Platform for powering Social Apps (http://qbix.com/platform)
undiscord - Undiscord - Delete all messages in a Discord server / channel or DM (Easy and fast) Bulk delete
twitter-clone - Twitter clone built using React, Redux, NodeJS, MYSQL
Signal-TLS-Proxy
website - Let's Encrypt Website and Documentation
duckduckgo-locales - Translation files for <a href="https://duckduckgo.com"> </a>
session-desktop - Session Desktop - Onion routing based messenger
MaterialAudiobookPlayer - Minimalistic audiobook player
Signal-Android - Patches to Signal for Android removing dependencies on closed-source Google Mobile Services and Firebase libraries. In branches whose names include "-FOSS". Uses new "foss" or "gms" flavor dimension: build with "./gradlew assemblePlayFossProdRelease".
TelegramAndroid - Fork client of Telegram app for Android.
LibreSignal - LibreSignal • The truly private and Google-Free messenger for Android.
Signal-Server - Server supporting the Signal Private Messenger applications on Android, Desktop, and iOS