action-label-syncer
action
| action-label-syncer | action | |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | |
| 189 | 111 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 10.0 | |
| 10 months ago | about 1 year ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
action-label-syncer
-
Making Open Source Easy - Orchestrating the Open Source Contribution Workflow
This is when we strongly felt the need to sync/orchestrate labels across all the repositories while also respecting the differences between the projects (one size may not fit all). This led us to a proof of concept with different label syncing tools and after quite a bit of analysis, we landed on Label Syncer to manage both master and repository level declarative labels (If someone from Github is reading this, maybe this should be an inbuilt feature 😇)
-
Fully Automated Dependency Upgrades with Dependabot and GitHub Actions
For me, automating the management of issue labels on GitHub was a small but important step to achieve consistency across my repositories. Many different tools exist to either sync or create labels, and after evaluating a few my choice fell on Label Syncer. Most importantly, its fully configured in code and as a GitHub Action part of the repository it manages.
action
-
How to make my team more efficient without being evil? Resource asks were canceled and trying to figure out what to do.
- He implemented a couple of automation tools - gitStream and ReviewPad - that auto assign PRs, add estimated review times, automate some easy code checks, etc.
-
Is it normal to have the bulk of your cycle time (like 80% of it) to be stuck in code review?
3) Use an automation/merging tool, probably gitStream or ReviewPad, that mitigates common hurdles/bottlenecks in the review process around PRs.
-
Modern Trunk-Based Development
At the moment, you can enforce pull request workflows to deal with this separation of concerns using the GitHub Reviewpad Action.
- Show HN: Reviewpad, a GitHub action to automate pull request workflows
What are some alternatives?
probot-auto-merge
reviewpad - Next generation pull requests and issues 🦄
probot-auto-merge - A GitHub App built with Probot that automatically merges pull requests
actionlint - :octocat: Static checker for GitHub Actions workflow files
graphql-mesh - The Graph of Everything - Federated architecture for any API service
cli - GitHub’s official command line tool
keepalive-workflow - GitHub action to prevent GitHub from suspending your cronjob based triggers due to repository inactivity
paste-secret - Paste your GitHub Secrets to files
areyouok - A fast and easy to use URL health checker ⛑️ Keep your links healthy during tough times (Out of box support for GitHub Actions)
slsa-provenance-action - Github Action implementation of SLSA Provenance Generation
apollo-angular - A fully-featured, production ready caching GraphQL client for Angular and every GraphQL server 🎁
workflow-watcher - Pause a GitHub Actions workflow and wait for another workflow to complete before continuing.