Pathfinder VS AutoBuilder

hey, i just figured i’d put this out here in case it helps: meccanum wheels, by nature, have a LOT of slip - that’s how they’re able to move in any direction. i’ve had quite a bit of experience with the math and kinematic behind this (two libraries i’ve written/am writing, Pathfinder and Pathfinder2, as well as a library the other programmer on my team wrote, OdometryCore) and it’s VERY HARD to accurately track the position of a meccanum robot only using the encoders in the wheels. it’s not impossible, but it’s very, very challenging. the more your robot moves, the less accurate it becomes, and it will very quickly report positions that are nowhere near where your robot actually is. you can go for it, but i would strongly encourage you check out three wheel odometry instead - it’s been very accurate and allowed us to do really cool things, like accurately record a robot’s movement and play it back perfectly. you’ll have much more success with three wheel odometry - my team designed a custom odometry system and i’m sure they’d be happy to give you more information if you’d like. best of luck :)

It is similar in function, but imo mine is much more intuitive & user friendly. It's open source so you can take a look at it here if you want to: https://github.com/FRC3476/AutoBuilder.