Vitals VS gnome-shell-impatience

GNOME Extensions : quick-settings-tweaker, appindicator and KStatusNotifier, arcmenu, blur-my-shell, dash-to-panel, forge, gsconnect, just-perfection, show-desktop-button, space-bar, user-themes and vitals

Look at line 481: https://github.com/corecoding/Vitals/blob/main/sensors.js

I love how simple and clean vitals for gnome looks, and always wanted a widget similar to it for KDE, but unfortunately couldn't find one, and no unfortunately I'm not here to say that I made one, I'm not really a developer so yeah..

Pano and Vitals would be mine.

There’s a gnome extension called vitals,which lets you get the information such as temp and usage and etc!!

https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/277/impatience/

Focus changer: Change focus between windows in all directions using your keyboard

do people even use gnome without impatience?

Recently, I installed the Impatience GNOME Shell extension in order to double GNOME animations speed.

I wanted to double animations speed in GNOME because I find them slow, and I recently read about the Impatience GNOME Shell extension. I found that cool so I downloaded it, extracted it and moved to my $HOME/.local/share/gnome-shell/extensions folder. I downloaded the right version, for my GNOME 41, it shows up in gnome-extensions list and Extensions app. However, as long as the extension is turned on, the animations are completely disabled, which improves my system speed but is not quite what I'm looking for. I'm about to try some alternatives like Just Perfection, but if I'm missing something about Impatience, please let me know: I like its simplicity and I kinda want to use it.