Verify
TestFX
Our great sponsors
Verify | TestFX | |
---|---|---|
5 | 5 | |
2,327 | 899 | |
2.4% | 0.8% | |
9.8 | 6.9 | |
4 days ago | 3 months ago | |
C# | Java | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Verify
-
Do you guys mock everything in your Unit Tests?
Bogus - For creating fake data Verify - Snapshot testing for .NET MELT - For testing ILogger usage Stryker - Mutation Testing for .NET TestContainers - run docker programmatically in integration tests
-
organizing testing projects
Are you familiar with "snapshot testing" tools such as Verify that store expected output in files. It's still unit testing.
-
Add persisted parameters to CLI applications in .NET
We can use Verify to perform snapshot testing and check for the correct output of the program. In order to make things easier and simplify working with process output capturing and invocation, I used CliWrap.
-
In EF Core every foreach is a potential runtime error that can't be properly fixed
You will have to write extra code to set up a code base to get it started (there's always a large initial cost in getting things set up, and you'll be writing code that helps get the state of your application setup), but I can assure you that our team paid the initial tax and the only reason our tests change now is because of requirements changes (and maybe sometimes because the testing tools we use like Verify have some breaking changes in behavior when we upgrade). Otherwise, it helps us identify issues in our code, particularly when we do library upgrades or change to a different library. Again, our tests do not change when we completely reimplement anything, just when the external contract changes. We just get to refactor/reimplement and have confidence that the old behavior stays the same. And then you get to hook up a benchmark to your tests and, if your reason for refactoring was performance reasons, you can show that it was effective.
-
Perfect Replayability
I assume this means you can take something like this, combine it with Snapshot/Approval testing (link to a library I have used), and then you have some quick-to-generate tests that help guard against regressions (even visual ones) by say:
TestFX
- Why won't FXRobot click my button?
-
Automating Java applications with JavaScript?
So for JavaFX the default one is TestFX. If you don't have the source code you probably need to find a tool able to locate them deierctly on your app. 5I didn't check if ti exists). Now for your initial question. TestFX is implmented in Java so if you really want to write you test in JS/TS you have to find a wrapper for your favorite language.
- JavaFX unit tests
-
What's the most interesting open-source project to study?
TestFX
-
How do I Junit test GUI applications?
Actual pure unit testing, you mock whatever the button interacts with outside of its unit with and see if they called with correct things or something. How useful this approach is, depends. Often it's more useful to test UI functionality with functional (or integration) tests, for example for javaFX with https://github.com/TestFX/TestFX or something similar.
What are some alternatives?
snapshooter - Snapshooter is a snapshot testing tool for .NET Core and .NET Framework
JUnit - A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java.
Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
JFoenix - JavaFX Material Design Library
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
AutoFixture - AutoFixture is an open source library for .NET designed to minimize the 'Arrange' phase of your unit tests in order to maximize maintainability. Its primary goal is to allow developers to focus on what is being tested rather than how to setup the test scenario, by making it easier to create object graphs containing test data.
Bogus - :card_index: A simple fake data generator for C#, F#, and VB.NET. Based on and ported from the famed faker.js.
Fine Code Coverage - Visualize unit test code coverage easily for free in Visual Studio Community Edition (and other editions too)
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter