UnstableFusion VS stable-diffusion-ui

Shameless plug: I was frustrated with the poor UI of notebook-based frontends so I wrote a desktop version here: https://github.com/ahrm/UnstableFusion .

Here is a video of some of its features: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLOhizAnSfQ&t=1s

Added advanced inpainting functionality to UnstableFusion, you can find the project here: https://github.com/ahrm/UnstableFusion

Github page: https://github.com/ahrm/UnstableFusion

CMDR2's 1-Click Installer

Hey so i'm currently using easydiffusion but its missing one feature i've been really wanting to play around with recently. Video, and i've heard from some others that its one of the easiest to install but least peformant and worse options you can get; so what do you guys suggest?

Or just use the CPU and it works, just takes a few minutes. stable diffusion cpu But don't let me stop you, I need one too.

No. CUDA is very straightforward. There is even a nice project that sets up Stable Diffusion for you. With basically no knowledge about AI i was able to get it to run. If i recall correctly i just needed to install one dependency manually, and i was provided with nice web gui for playing with it.

You could read the guide first: https://github.com/cmdr2/stable-diffusion-ui/wiki/UI-Overview or Start easy diffusion

Thanks and your right there are loads, trying out this from GitHub

Simplest start https://github.com/cmdr2/stable-diffusion-ui

First is Easy Diffusion, you need to be online just once to run the installer. It downloads several extra files. Let it finish and then make some test pictures. Exit everything (browser window and text window). Then anytime you want to run it, just turn off internet and run the batch file to start it up. No internet!

Yesterday I got Easy Diffusion to work (on Windows only), but it refuses to use the GPU and instead uses the CPU, which of course, takes nearly an hour to make a 512x512 image.