TriangularSolve.jl VS Pkg.jl

Compare TriangularSolve.jl vs Pkg.jl and see what are their differences.

TriangularSolve.jl

rdiv!(::AbstractMatrix, ::UpperTriangular) and ldiv!(::LowerTriangular, ::AbstractMatrix) (by JuliaSIMD)

Pkg.jl

Pkg - Package manager for the Julia programming language (by JuliaLang)
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
TriangularSolve.jl Pkg.jl
1 5
12 600
- 1.7%
6.6 9.0
3 days ago 4 days ago
Julia Julia
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

TriangularSolve.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of TriangularSolve.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-07.
  • Why Fortran is easy to learn
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Jan 2022
    > But in the end, it's FORTRAN all the way down. Even in Julia.

    That's not true. None of the Julia differential equation solver stack is calling into Fortran anymore. We have our own BLAS tools that outperform OpenBLAS and MKL in the instances we use it for (mostly LU-factorization) and those are all written in pure Julia. See https://github.com/YingboMa/RecursiveFactorization.jl, https://github.com/JuliaSIMD/TriangularSolve.jl, and https://github.com/JuliaLinearAlgebra/Octavian.jl. And this is one part of the DiffEq performance story. The performance of this of course is all validated on https://github.com/SciML/SciMLBenchmarks.jl

Pkg.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of Pkg.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-10.
  • Julia 1.9 Highlights
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 May 2023
    There was a "bug" (or just unhandled caching case) that effected the Pluto notebook system that required precompilation each time. This is because Pluto notebooks kept a manifest (so they always instantiated with the same packages every time for full reproducibility) and the instantiation of that manifest triggered not just package running but also precompilation. That was fixed in https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/pull/3378, with a larger discussion in https://discourse.julialang.org/t/first-pluto-notebook-launc.... That should largely remove this issue as in included in the v1.9 release (it was first in v1.9-RC2 IIRC).
  • Unable to load PDMats package.
    1 project | /r/Julia | 1 Jul 2022
    The closest thing I got to is this and I don't even understand what they are saying.
  • Why Fortran is easy to learn
    19 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Jan 2022
    Julia's compiler is made to be extendable. GPUCompiler.jl which adds the .ptx compilation output for example is a package (https://github.com/JuliaGPU/GPUCompiler.jl). The package manager of Julia itself... is an external package (https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl). The built in SuiteSparse usage? That's a package too (https://github.com/JuliaLang/SuiteSparse.jl). It's fairly arbitrary what is "external" and "internal" in a language that allows that kind of extendability. Literally the only thing that makes these packages a standard library is that they are built into and shipped with the standard system image. Do you want to make your own distribution of Julia that changes what the "internal" packages are? Here's a tutorial that shows how to add plotting to the system image (https://julialang.github.io/PackageCompiler.jl/dev/examples/...). You could setup a binary server for that and now the first time to plot is 0.4 seconds.

    Julia's arrays system is built so that most arrays that are used are not the simple Base.Array. Instead Julia has an AbstractArray interface definition (https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/interfaces/#man-inte...) which the Base.Array conforms to, and many effectively standard library packages like StaticArrays.jl, OffsetArrays.jl, etc. conform to, and thus they can be used in any other Julia package, like the differential equation solvers, solving nonlinear systems, optimization libraries, etc. There is a higher chance that packages depend on these packages then that they do not. They are only not part of the Julia distribution because the core idea is to move everything possible out to packages. There's not only a plan to make SuiteSparse and sparse matrix support be a package in 2.0, but also ideas about making the rest of linear algebra and arrays themselves into packages where Julia just defines memory buffer intrinsic (with likely the Arrays.jl package still shipped with the default image). At that point, are arrays not built into the language? I can understand using such a narrow definition for systems like Fortran or C where the standard library is essentially a fixed concept, but that just does not make sense with Julia. It's inherently fuzzy.

  • MlJ.jl: A Julia Machine Learning Framework
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Apr 2021
    This is exacerbated by the fact that Julia's Pkg.jl does not yet support conditional/optional dependencies [0]. A lot of these meta packages tend to pull everything but the kitchen sink.

    [0]: https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/issues/1285

  • Adding packages in Julia extremely painful
    1 project | /r/Julia | 29 Dec 2020
    The LTS release is over two years old, and Julia has received a lot of developer attention since then, resulting in new features and performance improvements that tutorial authors don't want to do without. You can safely use the latest stable release (v1.5.3), although you may also want to apply the Git registry fix (https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/issues/2014#issuecomment-730676631) for further improvements in download/setup speed.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TriangularSolve.jl and Pkg.jl you can also consider the following projects:

SuiteSparse.jl - Development of SuiteSparse.jl, which ships as part of the Julia standard library.

Pluto.jl - 🎈 Simple reactive notebooks for Julia

GPUCompiler.jl - Reusable compiler infrastructure for Julia GPU backends.

maptrace - Produce watertight polygonal vector maps by tracing raster images

MPI.jl - MPI wrappers for Julia

Fortran-code-on-GitHub - Directory of Fortran codes on GitHub, arranged by topic

BLIS.jl - This repo plans to provide a low-level Julia wrapper for BLIS typed interface.

AutoMLPipeline.jl - A package that makes it trivial to create and evaluate machine learning pipeline architectures.

rr - Record and Replay Framework

parca-demo - A collection of languages and frameworks profiled by Parca and Parca agent

18335 - 18.335 - Introduction to Numerical Methods course

ScientificTypes.jl - An API for dispatching on the "scientific" type of data instead of the machine type