Transphporm VS Twig

What I can say, since you're investing time into template engines, do you think any improvements can be made to transphporm? It was the one I looked for on your list and didn't see. Also happens to be the one I integrated for default suphle installations. Some points were raised in this issue https://github.com/Level-2/Transphporm/issues/5. I don't agree with all but I'm 100% on board with the idea of keeping all templating and logic outside the html

Here's a slightly neater approach: https://github.com/Level-2/Transphporm I created using some of the ideas from that article.

Pointing out the flaws in template engines doesn't really excuse this mess, it calls for a better template engine (e.g. https://github.com/Level-2/Transphporm ) which doesn't mix logic and markup. All you've accomplished here is mixing the logic and the markup at the PHP end instead of the template end.

As you can see this template will add and configura the Pest test suite with a custom TestCase class that will start the application for your tests, making easy to test your application services (as used by Orkestra itself) and you will see a basic application, with a single route in the file config/routes.php that calls a Controller that simply render a Twig view.

Miscommunication in our projects is costly. A single misunderstood User Story can result in 3 days of wasted development time. Additionally, when developers do not use the same programming language, it may be necessary to construct APIs to facilitate communication, which can also be expensive. It is important to consider why front-end developers may be hesitant to work with Twig and how this can lead to a disconnect between front-end and back-end development.

The first step before generating the PDF is writing the HTML. To generate the HTML string, we will use the Twig template engine, which is the default one in Symfony. It comes with tons of features such as inheritance, blocks, filters, functions, and more.

In the phase of outputting data, you can use template engines like Twig or Blade or htmlspecialchars function.

Joomla dips into and out of php to get vars/logic into the frontend, which is fine, but it's nowhere near as tidy as a full-fledged templating engine like blade or twig which many other php CMSs offer out of the box.

FTLOG, use a template engine. Do NOT use PHP itself as a template engine (ironic given its origins). The best are probably Twig (https://twig.symfony.com/) (used by Symfony and a few others) and Latte (https://latte.nette.org/) (less widely used, but its syntax is *way* more learnable as it's more like PHP itself).

It took me a while to find a PHP project that was simple enough for me to set up on a single Docker image, but after some trial and error I found the Twig project.