ToDo-FullStack VS psycopg2

8.We have .env file configuration from backend(steps 7). We should make sure that Heroku get those value from .env. But these values are not present at my github repo.

You can practice both by using https://www.psycopg.org from your Python code to communicate with your database. When I wanted to practice some SQL, that's what I did (we use psycopg at work, so that's what I practiced with, making a dream journal thingy for myself that was better than just noting stuff in a notepad because I could then look up e.g. what other stuff was correlated with Y, how many times I dreamed of X, etc. etc.)

But seems like it should work with Django 3, which you have specified https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/issues/1293

If you're using Postgres for your SQL, look at the "copy' method of the psycopg module (see https://www.psycopg.org/articles/2020/11/15/psycopg3-copy/) . It's much faster than INSERTs in my experience (YMMV).

Back when I used Psycopg2, there was no -binary package, so you'd get libpq set up similarly to pg-native. Docs say:

> The binary package is a practical choice for development and testing but in production it is advised to use the package built from sources.

Relevant GitHub discussion: https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/issues/674

I dunno, this seems worse to me.

Just go to the more easily readable docs here. I’m sorry, but the linked article is terrible.

psycopg2-binary. See https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/issues/1286.

psycopg2-binary, PostgreSQL Database adapter for python.

... # psycopg2==2.9.3 # https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2 ...

I sometimes do this in testing. For example, consider the library used to communicate with a Postgres database, psycopg.