TestableHttpClient VS Nullboard

Release notes can be found here: https://github.com/sandermvanvliet/TestableHttpClient/releases/tag/v2.3.0

Two things that I use daily:

Serilog.Sinks.InMemory for help with unit testing log messages etc: https://github.com/sandermvanvliet/SerilogSinksInMemory

TestableHttpClient to make testing API calls easier by providing a simple way to configure responses and behaviour as well as asserting actual calls: https://github.com/sandermvanvliet/TestableHttpClient

Both I think equal parts not invented here, “how hard is this really?”, not finding something at the time and just doing it for the fun of it

Hello, HN! I'd like to introduce you to nbagent[0], an open-source alternative backup agent for Nullboard[1] for Unix systems. If you, like me, are a fan of Nullboard's simplicity and you've been looking for an easy way to have your data backed up, check it out.

I'd love to hear your feedback on nbagent. Please feel free to leave comments, suggestions, or questions below.

[0] https://github.com/luismedel/nbagent

[1] https://nullboard.io/preview

Surprisingly no one has mentioned nullboard (https://nullboard.io/preview) yet. Just a single file JSON to carry around the entire board.

Nullboard maybe?

minimalist kanban board, without fancy tagging/time tracking/... features. Every game has a column, and notes are player names. nullboard would be perfect if it wasn't local only;

Nullboard - cool simple project, no bug tracking

Nullboard - Kanban board with dark mode, localStorage, and thoughtful UI

I use and like https://nullboard.io/preview nullboard which runs in the browser. Because it uses local data, you need to save it or the data is lost when you close the browser window.