dotfiles VS telega.el

I think it's beneficial to write these files in the normal way and then just add them to the store with simple home-services through local-file (plain-file is ok too but messier in my opinion). Its easier to understand, removes a point of failure in the scheme configuration -> normal configuration step, portable, "immutable", and it allows you to collect them all into one nice dotfiles repo. Here's mine for an example: https://github.com/Tass0sm/dotfiles/tree/master/home/files

I use Guix Home for managing my dotfiles on Arch Linux. I think its pretty fun but its not totally perfect. This config also isn't totally reproducible. Here's the link for that repository: https://github.com/Tass0sm/dotfiles

telega is the best messaging client I ever used. https://github.com/zevlg/telega.el

I just skimmed at the responses and already noticed some wrong parts: according to the Telegram git repo, Telegram supports version of Emacs 26.1+, there is really no need to “make sure you have the latest version of Emacs installed on your system”

Initially I thought about telega.el, telegram client which is, as far as I know, also uses json to communicate with server part written with C

https://github.com/zevlg/telega.el has a fairly rich user interface with active use of graphics

Telegram 😎

Regarding your points: 1. I use Firefox + Tridactyl, which seems a perfect combination: the rich ecosystem of Firefox and keyboard-controlled browser (was using qutebrowser before). There's also a browser in EAF, I don't know if anyone uses that, but it's an option I guess. 2. There is telega.el, which is an Emacs client for Telegram. There are also clients for Matrix & IRC, but not for any other mainstream messengers because their API is closed. There are also email clients for Emacs, I'm using notmuch. 3. Definitely check out org-roam.