UI tests without UI Testing experiment VS SwiftMonkey

Compare UI tests without UI Testing experiment vs SwiftMonkey and see what are their differences.

UI tests without UI Testing experiment

Testing the UI without UI Testing, a Swift experiment. (by joemasilotti)

SwiftMonkey

A framework for doing randomised UI testing of iOS apps (by zalando)
Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io
featured
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured
UI tests without UI Testing experiment SwiftMonkey
- -
21 1,932
- -
0.0 0.0
about 4 years ago over 2 years ago
Swift Swift
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

UI tests without UI Testing experiment

Posts with mentions or reviews of UI tests without UI Testing experiment. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning UI tests without UI Testing experiment yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

SwiftMonkey

Posts with mentions or reviews of SwiftMonkey. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning SwiftMonkey yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UI tests without UI Testing experiment and SwiftMonkey you can also consider the following projects:

Remote - Control your iPhone from inside Xcode for end-to-end testing.

Cucumber - A home for issues that are common to multiple cucumber repositories

ViewInspector - Runtime introspection and unit testing of SwiftUI views

Bluepill - Bluepill is a reliable iOS testing tool that runs UI tests using multiple simulators on a single machine

LayoutTest-iOS - Write unit tests which test the layout of a view in multiple configurations

Subliminal - An understated approach to iOS integration testing.

CrashMonkey - Monkey Test Tool For iOS

Kif - Keep It Functional - An iOS Functional Testing Framework

Floater_ - Add a floating fingertip to your app demo. www.buglife.com

EarlGrey - :tea: iOS UI Automation Test Framework

Nutrient – The #1 PDF SDK Library, trusted by 10K+ developers
Other PDF SDKs promise a lot - then break. Laggy scrolling, poor mobile UX, tons of bugs, and lack of support cost you endless frustrations. Nutrient’s SDK handles billion-page workloads - so you don’t have to debug PDFs. Used by ~1 billion end users in more than 150 different countries.
www.nutrient.io
featured
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
featured