Respawn
Fluent Assertions
Respawn | Fluent Assertions | |
---|---|---|
9 | 7 | |
2,518 | 3,593 | |
- | 0.8% | |
3.4 | 9.5 | |
3 days ago | 9 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Respawn
- Respawn: Intelligent database cleaner for integration tests
-
C# Tests failing using XUnit and EF InMemoryDatabase
ImMemoryDb isnt recommended for testing as it doesnt behave as a real database. Save yourself trouble and use a real database paired with Respawn.
-
Testing survey
I come from a .NET background and in the .NET environment I used to seed the database with the necessary data on each test and then clean the database at the end of the test using the Respawn library.
-
Opinions regarding move to TDD-focused employer
This was our initial approach (using sqlite) but our migrations take a while to run and this resulted in slow tests. Using Respawn to clean the db significantly improved test performance (https://github.com/jbogard/Respawn)
- [Parte 8] ASP.NET Core: Integration Tests
-
Pain & Gain of automated tests against SQL
Have you used something like Respwan https://github.com/jbogard/Respawn instead of creating and cleaning or deleting database every time? Not sure if it would help you. But I thought it might make your workflow little simpler. Respawn lets to restore db to a restore point.
-
share one RazorPage application of CleanArchitecture Project
NUnit, FluentAssertions, Moq & Respawn
- Swapping MSSQL provider for SQLite for testing?
-
Integration testing Api
You will need a separate test database purely for integration tests. You will need to reset the state of the DB every time using something like https://github.com/jbogard/Respawn. I always use the (localdb)\mssqllocal SQL instance that comes as standard with VS for dev and integration test databases.
Fluent Assertions
- Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
-
[Parte 8] ASP.NET Core: Integration Tests
FluentAssertions para Asserts muy flexibles y entendibles
-
BREAKING!! NPM package ‘ua-parser-js’ with more than 7M weekly download is compromised
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Newtonsoft.Json/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/AutoMapper/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/Dapper/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/FluentValidation/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/FluentAssertions/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/NUnit/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/xunit/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/YamlDotNet/ https://www.nuget.org/packages/Moq/ That is simply not true. Mature c# projects purposely maintain no downstream dependencies and is they do, it's to a major reputable lib. See for yourself - these are staple third party packages commonly used. Anything dependency starting with System or NETStandard is Microsoft maintained.
-
ASP.NET Core Unit Testing with FluentAssertions
FluentAssertions is one of the most popular (over 66 million downloads on Nuget) .NET library that contains a large collection of .NET extension methods that allow .NET developers to write unit tests using a fluent syntax which is very easy to read and write and clearly shows the intent of the unit test. The library has extension methods to test almost everything related to .NET such as Strings, Booleans, Dates, Guids, Collections, Exceptions, and even Nullable Types. You can add this library to your unit test projects via Nuget package manager and start using this library in few minutes.
-
My first NuGet package: Fluent Random Picker
I love fluency. I myself work on a package for fluent programming. I recommend you using FluentAssertions for tests though. Nonetheless, keep working! Starred your repo.
-
Honk#! Honk in convenient C# now!
For example, all tests below this line are written in Honk# + FluentAssertions (the latter is an example of a library which also provides a lot of fluent methods for xUnit to perform assertions). Soon I'll be moving more of its (AngouriMath's) code to this style, as long as it doesn't harm readability and performance.
-
Cell CMS - Criando testes de maneira prática
fluentassertions / fluentassertions
What are some alternatives?
NUnit - NUnit Framework
Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
EntityFramework.Docs - Documentation for Entity Framework Core and Entity Framework 6
ContosoUniversityDotNetCore-Pages - With Razor Pages
NFluent - Smooth your .NET TDD experience with NFluent! NFluent is an ergonomic assertion library which aims to fluent your .NET TDD experience (based on simple Check.That() assertion statements). NFluent aims your tests to be fluent to write (with a super-duper-happy 'dot' auto-completion experience), fluent to read (i.e. as close as possible to plain English expression), but also fluent to troubleshoot, in a less-error-prone way comparing to the classical .NET test frameworks. NFluent is also directly inspired by the awesome Java FEST Fluent assertion/reflection library (http://fest.easytesting.org/)
CleanArchitectureCodeGenerator - Generate the application features code class that conforms to the CQRS design pattern in the Application project - Visual Studio.net 2022 Extensions plugin
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
Brighter - A framework for building messaging apps with .NET and C#.
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
DbSample - Example of automated tests against SQL Server with EF Core
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.