ReassureTest.Net VS Atata

Doing testing right is about making sure a system works when running. Also tests should not break constantly upon code changes. I've over the years been an avid test advocate and used moq. But slowly I appreciate more higher level tests since they are more robust and verify all the spinning cogwheels in motion.. not in isolation. To help me I wrote https://github.com/kbilsted/ReassureTest.Net

nice read. what are your thoughts on this library https://github.com/kbilsted/ReassureTest.Net attempting at autogenerating much of the test code and allowing for fuzzy matching?

I'm writing an interpreter for object graphs and, their mutation and their traversal. The goal is making testing easier, faster and more fun. Perhaps the language and the way the interpreter works is of interest to you :-) https://github.com/kbilsted/ReassureTest.Net since the grammar is partly handled in the tokenizer and in the parser, the tokenizer is really simple

Have you looked in to Atata? It is a Web automation framework built around Webdriver. The logging provided out of the box is very comprehensive.

Proper link instead of whatever blogspam it is in the OP: https://atata.io/

Atata is a great open source project created by @yevgeniyshunevych

Atata is an automated testing framework based on Selenium. You can use C# code to define pages as class files, then really simply set up a wide variety of tests without needing to worry about what the client side looks like.