Reaktive VS turbine

There is another library developed by me - Reaktive. This one was done partly during the working hours and partly during my spare time. It is used in the apps (traces can be found in the APKs) and I'm totally fine of it being company's property.

I will say on the topic of multiplatform, rxjava isn't directly supported. However there is a multiplatform Rx library called reaktive which has way better testing support compared to coroutines at the moment. although if multiplatform is something you're interested in doing I would start the project off rather than do it later to save time in the long run. If you're interested, the mpp Todo sample is a good example demonstrating a lot of everything.

Much of this is now available in Mockito. Even more - naturally Kotlin doesn’t have static methods, and it’s a good practice not to create them. Ideal code is code that follows the SOLID and Clean Architecture principles, which means it can be easily mocked and tested. Therefore, we, Android developers, don’t need PowerMock’s special features but it’s important to remember that such frameworks exist. Another Mockito’s limitation concerns work with coroutines and flows. In such cases, once again, mockito-kotlin as well as third-party libraries like turbine will help you out. This being said, I’d like to tell you about another alternative to Mockito, which is Mockk.

All you need: https://github.com/cashapp/turbine

You've essentially converged on what Turbine does.

Turbine is an excellent library for testing flows and is pretty much required imo. But overall Rx is much easier to test; debugging works much more consistently and the built in testing functions are great.

turbine release 0.6.0

This issue on how StateFlows should be tested is probably also worth reading: https://github.com/cashapp/turbine/issues/19

Use https://github.com/cashapp/turbine