Programming-Language-Benchmark
Carbon
Programming-Language-Benchmark | Carbon | |
---|---|---|
5 | 18 | |
- | 16,444 | |
- | - | |
- | 9.3 | |
- | 3 days ago | |
PHP | ||
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Programming-Language-Benchmark
- Rust vs Zig Benchmarks
-
Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
I found Zig implementation of json parsing is interesting. The code is free from hidden control flow !.
https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
-
Nim vs Rust Benchmarks
It appears helloworld is the only test with any repeats, and it only has 5 repeats. https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
Here's the measurement code, it appears to be significantly more complicated than a simple fork/exec/wait loop but that could just be all the C# getting in the way: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark... Nevertheless you are probably right that the bulk of this 1.8ms is in the executable under test, and it truly is just bloat. Running `hyperfine ./empty-main-function` from rustc on my Mac gives 0.8ms.
-
Which programming language or compiler is faster
Is faster... on code that has been optimized to hell and back 5 times over and no longer resembles anything like normal code written in the language.
Seriously, this is the code for the top program. I'm reasonably sure 99% of C++ programmers could not decipher it without spending significant amounts of time on google: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
I appreciate that fair benchmarks across languages are a hard problem, but this is not a good solution to it. Any reference to this data as a comparison between "programming languages and compilers" needs to come with a giant disclaimer that it's comparing them at something you almost certainly don't use them for, and is very far from their main use case.
I also appreciate that this is a repetitive comment the likes of which always come up when this benchmark is mentioned... but I really don't see another way to avoid people misinterpreting it. Very few people are going to spontaneously click through to the code.
Carbon
-
PHP: check dates
Carbon is probably one of the most popular vendors to handle dates in PHP.
- Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
-
Why was the Carbon library called that?
Official page, at the very bottom.
-
Calendar page displaying empty boxes and not days and numbers - $this->date
Let me start by referring you to PHP's DateTime implementation. There is a library called Carbon that uses this DateTime implementation and added almost all the methods you have (but better). So there really is no need to create your own just to be able to display Dutch names. That way to can get rid of the nasty "globals".
-
The Wonderful Carbon - Laravel
At first we go to https://carbon.nesbot.com/ Here we will see a lot of interesting information and go deeper into it See also https://github.com/briannesbitt/Carbon
-
Need help formatting week day and time
first of all, i think you should use Carbon library. it's available here: https://github.com/briannesbitt/carbon
- Any help will be greatly appreciated
-
Do you use a DateTime wrapper?
See: https://github.com/briannesbitt/Carbon/issues/1693
-
Creating a Neat DateTime Helper Function in PHP
Working with datetime in PHP could be a real pain if you don't take advantage of popular libraries like Carbon. It's all good until you have to convert dates provided on user input into another timezone (eg. UTC) and vice versa. Other example could be that you have to manage various input datetime formats, and sanitize them into a consistent one before saving it to database.
-
Carbon - Float Difference in Months Filtered
Be careful of floatDiffInMonths() which can gives you a lower result (number of months in A < number of months in B) for an interval having more days (number of days in A > number of days in B) due to the variable number of days in months (especially February). By default, we rely on the result of DateTime::diff which is sensitive to overflow. See issue #2264 for alternative calculations.
What are some alternatives?
Programming-Language-Benchmarks - Yet another implementation of computer language benchmarks game
Moment.php - Parse, validate, manipulate, and display dates in PHP w/ i18n support. Inspired by moment.js
rosettaboy - A gameboy emulator in several different languages
Chronos - A standalone DateTime library originally based off of Carbon
awesome-python-typing - Collection of awesome Python types, stubs, plugins, and tools to work with them.
Yasumi - The easy PHP Library for calculating holidays
matrixmultiply - General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust. Supports matrices with general strides.
CalendR - The missing PHP 5.3+ calendar management library.
cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library
ExpressiveDate - A fluent extension to PHPs DateTime class.
weave - A state-of-the-art multithreading runtime: message-passing based, fast, scalable, ultra-low overhead
Duration for PHP - Working with durations made easy